FCC Rural Broadband Report Calls for USF Overhaul, Spectrum Audit
An FCC report on rural broadband prescribes government intervention to spur availability and demand. The report, released publicly on Wednesday, was required by Congress in the 2008 Farm Bill and did not require sign off by all commissioners. Instead, writing in the first-person, acting Chairman Michael Copps highlighted common problems affecting rural broadband, including technological challenges, lack of data and high network costs. Copps also urged a revamp of the Universal Service Fund, new rules on network openness and an audit of all spectrum that the FCC has licensed, with an eye on where it is being used effectively or should be subject to more use on a secondary basis.
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
If your job depends on informed compliance, you need International Trade Today. Delivered every business day and available any time online, only International Trade Today helps you stay current on the increasingly complex international trade regulatory environment.
The rural report is “a prelude to, and building block for, the national broadband plan, which will address in greater detail and on a vastly more complete record, the input of all stakeholders and the steps the nation must take to achieve its broadband goals,” Copps wrote. “The likely success of rural initiatives is intimately linked to a sound national broadband policy that reflects the complex interdependencies of regulatory policies, economic issues, and technological innovations.”
Though the report doesn’t necessarily reflect the views of the full commission, Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein praised many of the conclusions in a short written statement. “This isn’t a report that just talks about interagency coordination,” he said. “It has already served as a catalyst for encouraging greater discussion across the federal government that is unprecedented in my time on the Commission.”
The report envisions an active role for government in efforts to increase broadband availability in rural America. “A complementary government role in broadband deployment can yield advantages that a free market solution cannot achieve alone,” wrote Copps. “For example, government involvement in rural broadband may increase the efficiency and reliability of local services, such as law enforcement and emergency services; promote job growth and economic development by attracting and retaining businesses and increasing use of technology in a community; provide educational benefits, both for local schools and those seeking education online; and generally generate the indirect benefits to America that private deployers may not consider in their cost-benefit profit assessments.”
Copps recommended increased coordination among federal agencies; tribal, state and local governments; and community groups and individuals. The FCC and other federal agencies should develop their own rural broadband agendas, hold more joint hearings, and coordinate definitions of key terms like “rural” across programs, he said. Federal agencies should streamline existing broadband programs, and review non-broadband programs to see what opportunities exist to promote deployment, he said.
Rural broadband policy should be technology neutral, Copps said. “The solutions for rural broadband should reflect consideration of the full range of technological options available, and should not elevate the need for short-term progress over longer-term objectives,” he said. “However the rural networks are configured, they should be designed on principles of durability, reliability, openness, scalability, and interoperability so that they can evolve over time to keep pace with the growing array of transformational applications and services that are increasingly available to consumers and businesses in other parts of the country.”
The acting chairman also urged the addition of a nondiscrimination principle to the FCC’s Internet Policy Statement. The agency should establish a “systematic, expeditious, case-by-case process for adjudicating claims of discrimination,” he said. “The positive externalities and network effects of ubiquitous broadband will not be realized if consumers are all constrained by careful bundling, packaging, and discriminatory practices that whittle away the end-to-end structure of the public Internet.”
The report mentioned wireless 123 times, suggesting that efforts to build out wireless service in rural America have been a mixed bag at best. “In particular, parties have noted that there remains a lack of available, affordable, and suitable spectrum for rural wireless broadband; that our secondary market rules do not always promote spectrum trading and re-use; and that backhaul costs between wireless points of presence are prohibitively high,” the report said.
Government Web sites should be used to enhance coordination, Copps said. The FCC site, as well as the commission and Agriculture Department’s “Broadband Opportunities for Rural America” site, should be expanded to include links to all federal government programs related to rural broadband, he said.
To better assess U.S. broadband needs, the FCC should collect more data on availability and subscribership, speeds, prices, demand and infrastructure, Copps said. The agency and the administration should continue efforts to coordinate broadband mapping efforts, he said. To spur demand, government and private companies should develop consumer education and training and establish broadband affordability programs, Copps said.
The report also makes a pitch for satellite broadband. “With its near ubiquitous coverage and downstream data rates between 512 kbps and 5 Mbps, [satellite] can provide a much-needed connection in rural areas, especially where other broadband solutions are not viable for technical or other reasons,” the report said.