ITC Considers GEO in Louis Vuitton Patent Handbag & Luggage Case
The International Trade Commission has announced that it is considering what the effects of a general exclusion order directed against certain handbags, luggage, accessories, and packaging thereof (337-TA-754) would have upon the public welfare, competition conditions in the U.S., and U.S. consumers, in light of a March 5, 2012 Administrative Law Judge recommended determination on remedy and bonding. Comments are due by April 4, 2012.
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
If your job depends on informed compliance, you need International Trade Today. Delivered every business day and available any time online, only International Trade Today helps you stay current on the increasingly complex international trade regulatory environment.
(According to the ITC, the primary remedy available in Section 337 patent investigations is an exclusion order that directs Customs to stop infringing imports from entering the U.S. The exclusion from entry is limited to persons determined by ITC to be in violation, unless ITC determines that a general exclusion order is necessary to prevent circumvention, there is a pattern of violation, etc. In addition, the ITC may issue cease and desist orders against named importers and other persons engaged in unfair acts that violate Section 337.)
(See ITT's Online Archives 10123009 for summary of ITC's institution of this investigation.)
(FR Pub 03/15/12, 337-TA-754)