Trade-Related Court Cases Filed for Week of Feb. 2-8
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of Feb. 2-8:
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
If your job depends on informed compliance, you need International Trade Today. Delivered every business day and available any time online, only International Trade Today helps you stay current on the increasingly complex international trade regulatory environment.
ADC Telecommunications on the classification of value added modules, including wavelength division multiplexers, passive optical splitter modules and monitor modules. CBP classified the merchandise under subheading 9013.80.9000 (4.5%). ADC says it should have instead been classified under subheading 8517.62.0050 (free). #15-00032. Filed Feb.2.
Danze Inc. on the classification of ADA-compliant toilet bowls and tanks. CBP classified the merchandise under subheading 6910.10.0010 (5.8%). Danze says it should have instead been classified under subheading 9817.00.96 (free). #15-00033. Filed Feb. 3.
Appeals of CIT Decisions
No appeals of Court of International Trade decisions were filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit during the week of Feb. 2-8.