Trade-Related Court Cases Filed for Week of June 1-7
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of June 1-7:
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
If your job depends on informed compliance, you need International Trade Today. Delivered every business day and available any time online, only International Trade Today helps you stay current on the increasingly complex international trade regulatory environment.
DSM Nutritional Products on the classification of a stabilized vitamin B derivative. CBP classified the merchandise under subheadings 3824.90.28 (6.5%) and 3824.90.92 (5%). DSM says it should have instead been classified under subheading 2936.23.00 (free). #15-00155. Filed June 2.
DSM Nutritional Products challenging CBP's denial of its protests on the classification of carotenoids. CBP classified the merchandise under subheading 2106.90.97 (8.5% + 0.288¢/kg or 2106.90.99 (6.4%). DSM says it should have instead been classified under subheadings 3204.19.35 (3.1%), K3204.19.35 (free), and 2936.10.00 (free). #15-00156/00157. Filed June 2
KIA Motors America challenging a denied protest related to automotive vehicles. #15-00158. No summons available.
Hyundai Heavy Industries and Hyundai Corporation USA challenging the amended final results of the 2012-13 antidumping duty administrative review on large power transformers from South Korea. #15-00159. Filed June 5.
Nutricia North America on the classification of gastrointestinal products (Neocate One +, Neocate Junior, Neocate LCP, and Neocate (Infant)); and metabolic products (XPhen Tyr Maxamum, Xphe, Xtyr (XPXT) Maxamaid). CBP classified the merchandise under subheading 2106.90.9998 (6.4%). Nutricia says it should have instead been classified under subheading 3004.50.50 (free) or 9816.00.96 (free). #15-00160. Filed June 5.
Appeals of CIT Decisions
No appeals of Court of International Trade decisions were filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit during the week of June 1-7.