NAB Battles NHMC, Public Interest Groups on FCC Correspondence File Plan

Monday's deadline. “Members of the public rarely -- if ever -- access stations’ paper correspondence, instead relying on digital forms of communication to comment about a station’s performance,” said NAB. But “moving to an online-only format would frustrate poor people and people of color -- who still tend to rely on over-the-air television -- from effectively communicating with their local broadcasters,” said the National Hispanic Media Coalition with the AFL-CIO, Public Knowledge, Free Press, Common Cause, Communication Workers of America and Center for Media Justice. Eliminating the correspondence file doesn't have to stop the public from communicating with broadcasters, NAB said. “If members of the public still want to communicate with broadcasters through written mail or e-mail,” they can still do so, NAB said. Broadcaster arguments that the files are an unnecessary burden fly in the face of their claim that no one ever looks in the correspondence file, the public interest groups said. “One cannot claim credibly that staff are burdened by constant visits from the public and then also argue that such visits never actually happen because communications occur largely through social media.” The public groups downplayed broadcasters' concerns that allowing the public into stations to view such files is a security threat. The groups “support safe workspaces for broadcasters, but there are simply no documented incidents of violence resulting from an individual inspecting the public file," they said. The public interest groups haven't shown why such files are needed, NAB said. “If NHMC believes it imperative that broadcasters maintain their correspondence files, then it should produce at least some shred of evidence demonstrating the continuing value of those paper files.” The American Cable Association was the sole reply commenter to file on a commission proposal to eliminate a similar requirement for cable headend information. ACA wants the FCC to allow companies to continue to hold that information in their office and to be able to make it available to authorized representatives if they wish. “There is no policy justification for imposing new burdens on cable operators” ACA said.