CTA, CCIA Come to Cox's Defense in Torrent Piracy Lawsuit Appeal
Just providing Internet access doesn't infringe copyright, and a U.S. District judge in Alexandria, Virginia, "effectively guided the jury" to do exactly what the Supreme Court has cautioned against in other copyright infringement cases -- to find contributory infringement based…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
If your job depends on informed compliance, you need International Trade Today. Delivered every business day and available any time online, only International Trade Today helps you stay current on the increasingly complex international trade regulatory environment.
solely on not taking active steps to avert infringement by a third party, CTA and Computer & Communications Industry Association said in a joint amicus curiae brief (in Pacer) filed Monday with the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The brief was filed in Cox Communications' appeal of the lower court's ruling in favor of BMG Rights Management in its torrent piracy lawsuit against the cable ISP (see 1608190030). CTA/CCIA said Judge Liam O'Grady "compound[ed] this error" when he instructed the jury that it could find willful blindness from a general awareness of possible infringement instead of following Supreme Court precedent that requires deliberate actions. The lower court also held that the Digital Millennium Copyright Act wasn't a defense yet let the jury base its verdict on facts related to whether Cox had satisfied its safe harbor immunity from damages under the DMCA, CTA/CCIA said. "The jury was essentially invited to draw inferences of liability" from Cox not shutting off alleged copyright infringers rather than from whether the cable operator's workers took any volitional acts to encourage copyright infringement, the trade groups said. They called the ruling "contrary to sound public policy," arguing it undermined congressional intent in Section 512 of the DMCA, which covers liability limitations. CTA/CCIA called for the judgment against Cox to be reversed and for the case to remanded for entry of judgment in favor of the cable ISP or a new trial. Counsel for BMG didn't comment.