Not 'Prudent to Sit Idly by' on Lifeline Revamp, but FCC Still Deciding 'Best Path Forward,' Pai Says
FCC Chairman Ajit Pai said the commission is still determining “the best path forward” on revamping elements of the Lifeline USF program. His responded to letters from House Democrats that raised concerns that his preferred plan would mean major cuts…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
If your job depends on informed compliance, you need International Trade Today. Delivered every business day and available any time online, only International Trade Today helps you stay current on the increasingly complex international trade regulatory environment.
to the program’s subsidization of phone and internet services to low-income people. The revamp NPRM adopted in November seeks comment on creating a self-enforcing budget cap, setting a maximum subscriber discount level and ending both federal designation of Lifeline broadband providers and pre-emption of states' role in designating some eligible telecom carriers (see 1711160021). House Commerce Committee ranking member Frank Pallone, D-N.J., and Rep. Bobby Rush, D-Ill., led one letter in January. Rep. Anna Eshoo, D-Calif., and 67 other House members sent a separate letter in March (see 1803210061). Senate Aging Committee Chairman Susan Collins, R-Maine, and ranking member Bob Casey, D-Pa., more recently also raised concerns (see 1805180043). “I am deeply committed to ensuring that the Commission fulfills its obligation to be a responsible steward of” USF, Pai said, posted Monday. “It is critical to strengthen the Lifeline program's efficacy and integrity by reducing the waste, fraud, and abuse that has run rampant in this program for the better part of a decade.” The national verifier of consumer eligibility for the program the FCC is implementing “will be one important tool in eliminating this waste, fraud, and abuse,” but “it simply isn't prudent to sit idly by when hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars are at stake,” Pai said. “That's why the Commission last year sought comment on a wide variety of measures to improve the administration of the Lifeline program.” Pai disputed suggestions that an accompanying November order will cut off Lifeline support to tribal members. He said the changes were designed to "incentivize providers" to deploy broadband networks on tribal lands. "All eligible Americans who apply will continue to receive support, but that enhanced support will now be tailored to better target those in need," he responded to Rep. Raul Ruiz, D-Calif., and 31 colleagues. "Similarly false are suggestions that the Commission did not consult with Tribes before adopting the 2017 Lifeline Reform Order," he added, citing comments from, and consultations with, various tribal parties: "As Chairman, I have participated in three official Tribal consultations, made numerous visits to Tribal communities, and met with Tribal representatives, including the Navajo Nation."