O'Rielly Concerned About E-Rate WAN Overbuilding, Seeks USAC Answers
FCC Commissioner Mike O'Rielly again objected to E-rate overbuilding of networks and asked Universal Service Administrative Co. to clarify its understanding of the rules and detail its treatment of applications. He's "very concerned" E-rate subsidies are reportedly being used to…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
If your job depends on informed compliance, you need International Trade Today. Delivered every business day and available any time online, only International Trade Today helps you stay current on the increasingly complex international trade regulatory environment.
overbuild USF-backed fiber networks in some Texas school districts. "At least three regional-based consortia (representing 'Educational Service Centers') have sought proposals, via the Form 470, for the construction of Wide Area Networks (WANs) to provide Internet access to entire school regions, each covering well over ten thousand square miles, even though multiple fiber-based providers are already capable of serving the individual schools," he wrote Thursday to USAC CEO Radha Sekar, citing a Nov. 19 filing by telco cooperatives. The consortiums have filed Form 471 and "largely been approved" for "over $100 million to lay new fiber to schools already served by fiber networks. ... partially paid for with federal funds," O'Rielly said. "This number does not even include the subsidies requested for connecting individual schools within the WAN that were already connected to existing fiber networks." In one case, "a winning bidder was approved to receive over $40 million in special construction costs for a fiber build, even though most of the district already has fiber connectivity," he added. It's "likely that support for these fiber builds will also subsidize warehousing of fiber capacity not needed for E-Rate purposes." He asked Sekar to respond by April 1 to questions, including if E-rate rules let USAC fund: (1) special construction projects, whether through self-provisioned or commercial networks, that "duplicate, in whole or in part, fiber networks" built with federal funds; and (2) consortium "construction of a WAN to provide Internet access to the entire consortium, even where fiber-based providers are already capable of serving individual consortium members." He sought answers on the number of WAN-related applications, approvals and denials, and on any USAC warnings to the FCC about "overbuilding risk" or "an apparent gap" in rules permitting overbuilding approvals. USAC and FCC spokespersons didn't comment.