Radio Broadcasters Call for Changes, Delay for Draft FM Translator FM Order

FCC filings posted Wednesday. The order would tie the minimum number of complaints to the population served by the complaining full-power station, with the number required ranging from three for low-power FM stations to 65 for the largest full-power FMs. By basing the requirement on the population served by the full power, that could make it impossible for large stations to find enough complaints, Beasley and iHeart wrote commissioners and told Media Bureau staff, now in docket 18-119. “Basing the number of required complaints on the population being served by the complaining station divorces the required number of complaints from the actual interference.” A station with a highly populated coverage area that experiences interference in a sparsely populated area “may be unable to find enough listeners in that interference area,” said the companies. Tie the number of complaints to the area where interference is occurring, and cap it at 25, they said. Though the draft order also didn’t follow the broadcasters’ recommendations for a 42 dBu contour, Beasley and iHeart said that, outside the complaint issue, the agency has “an exemplary job” balancing between translators and full powers. If the FCC changes the complaint minimums, "set a workable path for the prompt and fair resolution of FM translator interference complaints,” the radio-station owners asked. Bonneville International, iHeart Communications and the Educational Media Foundation also wrote a letter to all five commissioners objecting to questions raised by REC Networks about how the FM translator interference draft order would interact with "super-maximum" class B stations (see 1904250055). "REC’s request goes far beyond the issues proposed in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in this proceeding and would also result in upsetting established listener expectations," the joint letter said. REC had suggested the interference rules for the high-powered, grandfathered Class B FM stations wouldn't calculate such station's interference limit using their maximum range, but instead the range of other stations in their class. "Such an action would be contrary to the mission of the Commission’s rules in protecting the reception of existing stations’ service to people in populated areas from potential interference caused by secondary stations," the joint letter said. "The NPRM in this proceeding did not suggest any special treatment of super-power FM stations, nor did the Draft Order." In its own letter to the FCC on translator interference, the New Jersey Broadcasters Association urged the FCC to postpone the planned May 9 vote on the interference order and "extend the time period in which to file further responses by 30 days." NJBA wants a 40 dbU contour and a maximum of 12 complaints. New Jersey broadcasters have historically dealt with unfair allocations of frequencies, compared with New York and Pennsylvania, and that issue "should not be exacerbated by new rule changes that would negatively impact our broadcasters and the audiences," the group said.