List 4 Tariffs Must Include ‘Broader,’ ‘Rolling,’ Transparent Exclusion Process, CTA Says
The Consumer Technology Association “urges the administration to quickly implement a broader and more effective exclusion process for List 4” than it did for lists 1 and 2, it said in comments posted in docket USTR-2019-0004. “Unlike the product exclusion process for the first two tranches of tariffs,” which required applicants to submit requests by a hard deadline, “circumstances warrant” installing a process for List 4 that works “on a rolling basis,” it said.
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
If your job depends on informed compliance, you need International Trade Today. Delivered every business day and available any time online, only International Trade Today helps you stay current on the increasingly complex international trade regulatory environment.
“Imposing an end date runs counter to the administration’s policies to encourage American innovation and product development,” CTA said. A rolling process would “minimize the burden” on companies and the administration “because importers will likely be able to provide more specificity in their requests, having had the benefit of time to assess the impact of the tariffs on their business,” it said.
There are many things the administration "is trying to do” to make the tariffs “as painless" as possible, including accepting exclusion requests, U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer told a Senate Finance Committee hearing June 18 (see 1906180070). Lighthizer answered "yes" when Sen. Margaret Wood Hassan, D-N.H., asked him if he would commit to a List 4 exclusion process if those tariffs were put into effect.
The administration should “establish and publish clear criteria and weighting methodologies by which it will evaluate the List 4 product exclusion requests,” CTA said, addressing a common complaint among trade experts that the exclusion processes have lacked transparency. Administration staff “reviewing product exclusion requests should apply these criteria in a way that ensures consistency and procedural fairness prior to final determinations being made,” CTA said. Companies deserve “a comprehensive and timely explanation” of the exclusion decision “based on these criteria,” it said.
The List 4 tariffs "will increase prices for consumers on both cutting-edge electronics and mainstream, every-day products," CTA said. It commissioned a new Trade Partnership study that found smartphone prices would rise “across the board” if 25 percent tariffs took effect on goods imported from China under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule’s 8517.12.00 subheading.
About three of four smartphones imported to the U.S. come from China, and those would rise in cost by 22 percent, the study said. Tariffs also would generate a 14 percent cost increase in phones shipped to the U.S. from all countries of origin, it said. The average phone would rise about $70 in retail price, it said. U.S. consumers will be “forced to reduce overall purchases by 28 percent,” it said.
Tariffs on Chinese laptops and tablets imported to the U.S. under HTS 8471.30.01 would raise pricing by 19 percent across the board, including 21 percent on Chinese goods, the study said. It estimates the retail price of the average laptop would rise by $120. Producers in Vietnam would be “the biggest winner” from U.S. tariffs on Chinese laptops and tablets, American consumers the biggest losers, the study said.
Tariffs on videogame consoles imported from China would seriously harm U.S. consumers, Microsoft, Nintendo and Sony Interactive Entertainment said in rare joint comments by the rivals for the removing of HTS 9504.50.00 goods from List 4. In 2018, more than 96 percent of the consoles imported into the U.S. came from China, they said: “It would cause significant supply chain disruption to shift sourcing entirely to the United States or a third country, and it would increase costs -- even beyond the cost of the proposed tariffs -- on products that are already manufactured under tight margin conditions.”
The proposed List 4 tariffs on semiconductors and the broader information technology industry “will harm America’s tech companies, and are an ill-equipped tool” to curb China’s “problematic” trade practices, the Semiconductor Industry Association said. The administration’s previous tariffs “encompass nearly the entire semiconductor supply chain,” SIA said. The proposed List 4 tariffs “now threaten virtually all information technology products -- and purchasers of semiconductors -- including key consumer products,” it said.
LG Display America plans to import $15 million worth of monitors and components and LCD TV panel modules this year from China classified under the HTS 8528.52.00 and 9013.80.90 subheadings for its U.S. repair services, it said. Imposing 25 percent duties on TV panels to be repaired or replaced at the subsidiary’s Carlsbad, California, service center “will directly and negatively impact” the company and its U.S. workers, it said.
Canon USA wants the digital cameras it imports from China under the HTS 8525.80.40 subheading removed from List 4, it said. It sources the cameras from a Canon factory in China that's “not ultimately Chinese-owned,” it said. Canon USA is “not able” to source the cameras in the U.S., nor are there “feasible alternative sources of supply outside of China,” it said.