Corrections Officials, Industry Still at Odds on How to Fight Contraband Devices

put jamming on the table, which carriers strongly oppose (see 2009170053). Comments were posted Friday in docket 13-111. CTIA contends MAS technologies are “operational and successful today,” CLA said. “Corrections institutions face many challenges with using MAS,” the group commented: “Multiple departments of correction” have used MAS technologies “and they have not been overwhelmingly effective. The problem with MAS is not only the cost, operational burdens, and logistical issues that were cited in various CTIA comments, but the fundamental fact that MAS systems are not effective.” CTIA opposes micro-jamming but has never conducted field tests, CLA said. “Correctional facilities always have the ability to use landlines to call 9-1-1 and can even turn off the jamming system in the event of an emergency,” the group said. “Jamming also does not interfere with radios or any frequencies with which the jamming system is not designed to interfere.” CTIA disagreed. MAS, “available and proven today, is the most effective contraband interdiction solution, and MAS-Evolved will be even more efficient and effective,” CTIA said. Alternatives to MAS “are similarly expensive without offering the clear advantages of MAS,” the association said. CTIA said jamming isn’t a viable option: “Because of their indiscriminate nature, jamming mechanisms endanger legitimate communications -- including public safety communications and 9-1-1 calls -- both within and near correctional facilities. Moreover, jamming does not offer the cost savings that some have suggested.” The FCC made jamming illegal for “good reasons” and it's “a grave risk to public safety,” AT&T said: “Reject calls for carriers to freeze technology evolutions or degrade service around prisons. Such efforts would have minimal benefit in the fight against contraband device use while having unintended consequences for consumers and businesses located in proximity to prisons.” A court-order process to terminate service to contraband devices “best provides the assurances that contraband devices are correctly identified, correctional facilities personnel requesting termination have provided sufficient justification for the request, and wireless carriers are specifically authorized to take the actions requested and are protected from liability for potential violations the Communications Act and other statutes,” T-Mobile commented.