Private Mediation ‘Acceptable,’ Say Qwest v. Peerless Parties
The U.S. District Court for Colorado, per a Nov. 2 order (see 2211030043), instructed plaintiffs Qwest, Level 3 and Global Crossing to confer with defendant Peerless Network and “make a showing in writing as to why private mediation is not…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
If your job depends on informed compliance, you need International Trade Today. Delivered every business day and available any time online, only International Trade Today helps you stay current on the increasingly complex international trade regulatory environment.
feasible under the circumstances of this case,” said a joint mediation notice Thursday (docket 1:21-cv-03004). “Private mediation is acceptable to the Parties,” they told the court. Plaintiffs and defendants “will work together to identify a mediator and conduct private mediation,” they said. The case involves negotiated interconnect agreements and the access tariffs associated with them. Qwest, Level 3 and Global Crossing sued Peerless affiliates in eight states in November alleging that they engaged in a scheme of avoiding mandatory switched access charges, thereby giving them an unfair competitive advantage in the toll-free marketplace. The defendants countersued in March alleging the companies used unfair and unsupported billing methods, to the detriment of the Peerless affiliates.