Trade-Related Court Cases Filed Feb. 6-12
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of Feb. 6-12:
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
If your job depends on informed compliance, you need International Trade Today. Delivered every business day and available any time online, only International Trade Today helps you stay current on the increasingly complex international trade regulatory environment.
Shanghai Tainai Bearing Co., Ltd. and C&U Americas, LLC, challenging the Commerce Department's final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on tapered roller bearings and parts thereof, finished and unfinished, from China. #23-00020. Filed Feb. 6.
Chemical Products Corporation, challenging Commerce's final negative antidumping duty determination in the AD investigation on barium chloride from India. #23-00021. Filed Feb. 6.
Federation of Indian Quartz Surface Industry, challenging the Commerce Department's final results in the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on quartz surface products from India, covering entries in 2019-2021. #23-00026. Filed Feb. 7.
APB Trading, LLC; Cosmos Granite (West) LLC; Cosmos Granite (South West) LLC; DivyaShakti Limited; DivyaShakti Granites Limited; Overseas Manufacturing and Supply Inc., doing business as Merrimack Stone Industries; Cosmos Granite (South East) LLC; Curava Corporation; Marudhar Rocks International PVT Ltd.; Stratus Surfaces LLC; and Quartzkraft LLP, challenging the Commerce Department's final results in the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on quartz surface products from India, covering entries in 2019-2021. #23-00029. Filed Feb. 8.
Antique Marbonite Private Limited, Shivam Enterprises and Prism Johanson Limited, challenging the Commerce Department's final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on quartz surface products from India, covering entries in 2019-2021. #23-00030. Filed Feb. 8.
Larson-Juhl US LLC, challenging CBP's denial of its protest over imports of picture frame mouldings. #23-00032. Filed Feb. 9.
Dis Vintage LLC, challenging CBP's denial of its protest concerning the classification of its worn clothing imports. #23-00033. Filed Feb. 9.
Dropship Vendor Group, LLC, challenging CBP's denial of its protest over CBP's decision to change the country of origin for the company's furniture imports from Malaysia to China. #23-00034. Filed Feb. 9.
Store Supply Warehouse, LLC, challenging CBP's denial of its protest over CBP's refusal to grant Section 301 tariff exclusions and refusal to reliquidate without assessment of Section 301 tariffs. #23-00035. Filed Feb. 10.
Another eight lawsuits were filed at the CIT to challenge lists 3 and 4A Section 301 tariffs on products from China (see 2009220029). For a full list, see the Pacer database.
Appeals of CIT Decisions
The following appeals of Court of International Trade decisions were filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit during the week of Feb. 6-12:
Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee, challenging a December 2022 Court of International Trade decision upholding the Commerce Department's remand results dropping the agency's reliance on an Enforce and Protect Act case to reject third-country sales to calculate normal value in an antidumping duty case. #23-1469. Opened Feb. 7.