Meta Cites Judge's Ruling in Another Texas Case to Support Its Transfer Motion
Meta filed a second notice of supplemental authority to support its motion to transfer a case to California from U.S. District Court for Northern Texas in Dallas, citing a recent ruling by U.S. District Judge Michael Truncale in Texas Nationalist…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
If your job depends on informed compliance, you need International Trade Today. Delivered every business day and available any time online, only International Trade Today helps you stay current on the increasingly complex international trade regulatory environment.
Movement et al. v. Meta Platforms (docket 1:22-cv-00572) in U.S. District Court for Eastern Texas in Beaumont. Truncale’s Aug. 17 order, granting Meta’s motion to transfer in a lawsuit that also asserts a claim under chapter 143A of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, determined that Meta’s forum-selection clause is “mandatory, valid, and enforceable, and that extraordinary circumstances did not weigh against transfer,” said Meta's Monday notice (docket 3:23-cv-00217). “In doing so, it specifically rejected arguments—like those here -- that the plaintiffs could avoid their contractual obligations by asserting that Meta’s forum-selection clause violates Texas public policy or is contained in a contract of adhesion,” Meta said. Two private Facebook groups, Wise Guys I and Wise Guys II, alleged in a January complaint that Meta engaged in “viewpoint discrimination.” Meta filed a motion to transfer the case in March, saying “not only does the complaint lack the facts necessary to allege a substantive claim or establish personal jurisdiction over a California company, but Wise Guys’ underlying legal theories -- including that they can use Texas’ novel social-media censorship law to control out-of-state conduct or that they can assert the First Amendment against a private entity -- are untenable as a matter of law" (see 2305020037).