Defendants’ Answer in Ind. AG’s Robocalling Lawsuit Offers No Affirmative Defenses
MV Realty, five of its subsidiaries and three of its officers deny the allegations in the 24-count complaint filed Sept. 5 by Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita (R) that they perpetuate an aggressive and illegal robocalling and telemarketing operation that…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
If your job depends on informed compliance, you need International Trade Today. Delivered every business day and available any time online, only International Trade Today helps you stay current on the increasingly complex international trade regulatory environment.
targets Indiana homeowners (see 2309060001), said the defendants’ answer Tuesday (docket 1:23-cv-01578) in U.S. District Court for Southern Indiana in Indianapolis. Their answer offered no affirmative defenses. Rokita alleges the defendants offer homeowners cash payments in exchange for a future interest in the sale of the homeowner’s real property. The homeowner benefit agreement, as their offer is called, is “nothing more than a disguised extension of credit with implicit interest to be paid back by the homeowner at a future date,” alleges the complaint.