Plaintiff Denies Defendant’s Counterclaim He’s a TCPA Common Law Fraudster
Nelson Estrada denies the allegations in defendant Aragon Advertising’s Telephone Consumer Protection Act counterclaim that he’s a common law fraudster, said Estrada’s answer Wednesday (docket 4:23-cv-03407) in U.S. District Court for Southern Texas in Houston. The plaintiff’s Sept. 12 class…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
If your job depends on informed compliance, you need International Trade Today. Delivered every business day and available any time online, only International Trade Today helps you stay current on the increasingly complex international trade regulatory environment.
action alleged that Aragon inundated his cellphone with 37 “unauthorized and illegal” solicitation calls, to a number listed on the national do not call registry since June 2008 (see 2312070040). Aragon alleged in its Dec. 6 counterclaim that Estrada is a budding professional TCPA litigant who shops lawsuits around different law firms, and that he faked interest in Aragon’s products and services just to drive up the call count to extract a higher settlement payout for his “manufactured TCPA claim.” Estrada’s answer asks the court to enter judgment in his favor and to dismiss Aragon’s counterclaim with prejudice.