CBP Extends Deadline to Collect Public Comments on Importer Identification Data
CBP has extended its deadline by 30 days for soliciting feedback on the information that the agency intends to collect in ACE on importer identification data.
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
If your job depends on informed compliance, you need International Trade Today. Delivered every business day and available any time online, only International Trade Today helps you stay current on the increasingly complex international trade regulatory environment.
The agency is accepting public comments through Sept. 30, it said in a notice. CBP will summarize the comments and then submit them to the Office of Management and Budget for review.
CBP collects importer identification data using the “Create/Update Importer Identity Form,” commonly referred to as “CBP Form 5106.” The agency says it uses this form to serve as the basis for establishing bond coverage, release and entry of merchandise, liquidation, and the issuance of bills and refunds. Members of the trade community use the Create/Update Importer Identification Form to register an entity as an Importer of Record (IOR) in the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE). Registering as IOR with CBP is required if an entity intends to transact Customs business and be involved as an importer, consignee/ultimate consignee, any individual or organization involved as a party, such as 4811 party, or sold to party on an informal or formal entry. The number used to identify an IOR is either an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Employer Identification Number (EIN), a Social Security Number (SSN), or a CBP-Assigned Number. Collecting this information from the importer enables CBP to verify the identity of the importers and meet regulatory requirements for collecting information.
CBP is asking for comments on (1) whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) suggestions to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) suggestions to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.