Katharine Tai, President Joe Biden’s nominee for U.S. trade representative, enjoys broad bipartisan support in Congress through her work as a USMCA negotiator when she was House Ways and Means Committee chief trade counsel, Nicole Bivens Collinson, Sandler Travis president-international trade and government relations, told a Sports & Fitness Industry Association webinar Feb. 23. Tai’s Senate Finance Committee confirmation hearing is set for 10 a.m. Feb. 25, and she’s going to be asked a lot of questions about the Biden administration’s posture toward the Section 301 tariffs on China, Collinson said. If all goes as well as expected with her confirmation process, Tai could be sworn in as USTR as soon as March 8, she said.
Paul Gluckman
Paul Gluckman, Executive Senior Editor, is a 30-year Warren Communications News veteran having joined the company in May 1989 to launch its Audio Week publication. In his long career, Paul has chronicled the rise and fall of physical entertainment media like the CD, DVD and Blu-ray and the advent of ATSC 3.0 broadcast technology from its rudimentary standardization roots to its anticipated 2020 commercial launch.
The U.S. Court of International Trade plans to “proceed first” on choosing a “representative sample” of test cases to manage the roughly 3,500 Section 301 complaints inundating the court, said an order signed Feb. 16 by the three-judge panel of Mark Barnett, Claire Kelly and Jennifer Choe-Groves. All the suits seek to get the List 3 and List 4A Chinese tariffs vacated and the duties refunded with interest. “The court expects that the number of sample cases identified will be small enough to permit the efficient disposition of this litigation while allowing the court to consider all claims raised by the various Plaintiffs,” the order said. “The court anticipates issuing a stay of all Section 301 cases assigned to the panel that are not selected to proceed as sample cases.”
More than 3,500 Section 301 complaints have inundated the U.S. Court of International Trade challenging the lawfulness of the lists 3 and 4A tariffs on Chinese imports, “and there’s likely more to come,” trade lawyer John Brew of Crowell & Moring told a Sports and Fitness Industry Association webinar Jan. 26.
The U.S. and Vietnam held “consultations” Dec. 23 on allegations that Hanoi deliberately devalued the dong against the dollar to the detriment of American commercial interests, it was disclosed in the Section 301 investigative report from the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative ruling out tariffs on Vietnamese goods in the final days of the Trump administration (see 2101150053). The report shared nothing about the substance of the previously unknown talks, held roughly a week before USTR convened a virtual hearing Dec. 29 into Vietnam’s alleged currency misbehavior. Agency representatives made no mention of the consultations during the hearing.
The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative will not impose Trade Act Section 301 tariffs on Vietnam imports in the remaining days of the Trump administration for Hanoi’s allegedly improper devaluation of the dong against the dollar, though it did find Vietnam’s practices “actionable” under the statute, and “will continue to evaluate all available options,” the agency said Jan. 15. The decision to forgo tariffs was sure to bring welcome relief to the hundreds of companies, trade associations and business groups that argued vehemently against them in recent weeks, including in a Dec. 29 virtual hearing (see 2012290036).
November Census Bureau import data newly released through the International Trade Commission’s DataWeb tool documents Vietnam’s significant and growing role in the consumer tech supply chain. Vietnam as a sourcing country made substantial import share gains in product categories experiencing historic spikes in consumer demand during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially TVs with screen sizes under 35 inches, DataWeb shows. The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative is considering whether to impose Section 301 tariffs on goods from Vietnam (see 2101110035).
The 22-person witness list for the Dec. 29 virtual Section 301 investigative hearing into allegations that Vietnam deliberately undervalued its currency to thwart U.S. economic growth is stacked heavily with people on record as opposing remedial tariffs on Vietnamese imports. Prehearing submissions in docket USTR-2020-0037 foretell some will also testify that the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative is singling out the wrong country for Section 301 currency manipulation review and is doing so for ulterior motives.
The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative released a list of witnesses slated to testify during the Dec. 29 Section 301 hearing on Vietnam currency manipulation. The agency hasn't addressed a request from trade associations that USTR delay the hearing in order to consider a Dec. 16 Treasury Department report blasting the Vietnam government for tampering with the foreign exchange market “in a sustained, asymmetric manner,” to the detriment of U.S. interests. Treasury released the report nearly a week after the deadline passed for submitting requests to appear at the USTR hearing.
The Consumer Technology Association would be “extremely affected and disappointed” by any Trump administration rush to impose Trade Act Section 301 tariffs on Vietnamese imports before leaving office, President Gary Shapiro said in a Dec. 16 interview. “Our industry has suffered, in the national interest in a sense, because of U.S. positions taken on China,” he said, and additional tariffs on goods from Vietnam would be an unexpected, secondary blow.
Though TVs with the largest screen sizes maintained their dominance in the mix of October imports coming into the U.S., shipments skewed toward sets with screen sizes under 45 inches, according to Census Bureau data accessed Dec. 13 through the International Trade Commission’s DataWeb tool. October imports of laptops and tablets, meanwhile, continued their torrid growth trend, recording the category’s highest monthly volume in six years.