House Communications Subcommittee members largely but not completely avoided using a Thursday FCC oversight hearing to make partisan points, amid the commission’s focus on bipartisan issues during the ongoing 2-2 split, as expected (see 2203300001). Lawmakers instead focused on questions about the FCC’s work to produce improved broadband connectivity data maps, its handling of the affordable connectivity program and Emergency Connectivity Fund programs, and how commissioners believe Congress should structure a renewal of the commission’s spectrum auction authority.
Sen. Todd Young, R-Ind., and Rep. Doris Matsui, D-Calif., expressed optimism Monday that Congress can begin conference negotiations on its China package before the end of the work period, as planned by Senate leadership (see 2203140059).
House Communications Subcommittee members are continuing to wrestle with whether and how to package legislation to reauthorize the FCC’s spectrum auction authority with other related policy matters. Witnesses at a Wednesday hearing on those issues urged Congress to quickly renew the FCC’s sales authority and cited a range of other matters lawmakers should simultaneously consider, including directing proceeds to pay for other telecom projects and addressing interagency disputes on frequency allocations (see 2203150069).
Witnesses scheduled for a Wednesday House Communications Subcommittee hearing on 5G and spectrum management issues (see 2203090074) urged lawmakers in written testimony to prioritize reauthorizing the FCC’s spectrum auction authority. Witnesses also cite interest in legislation to direct proceeds to pay for other telecom projects and address interagency disputes on frequency allocations. Congress last extended the FCC’s auction authority via the 2012 spectrum law. That authorization will expire Sept. 30. The partly virtual hearing is to begin at 10:30 a.m. in 213 Rayburn.
Telecom-focused lawmakers told us they want more information before committing to pursue more money for additional funding for the FCC’s Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Reimbursement Program to repay U.S. carriers for removing from their networks equipment made by Huawei, ZTE and other companies deemed a national security risk. Eight major communications groups wrote the leaders of the House and Senate Appropriations committees earlier this month to press for additional “rip and replace” funding (see 2203030074).
Telecom-focused lawmakers are trying to beat the legislative clock as they seek a way to renew the FCC’s spectrum auction authority, currently set to expire when FY 2022 ends Sept. 30. The House Communications Subcommittee is eyeing a March 16 hearing on auction authority reauthorization and potential ways to spend revenue from additional auctions, Hill aides and lobbyists told us. FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel recently asked Congress to authorize the agency to use proceeds to pay for next-generation 911 tech upgrades (see 2202220057). Congress last extended the FCC’s auction authority via the 2012 spectrum law.
Senate Antitrust Subcommittee Chairwoman Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., said Monday she hopes to “somehow combine” the American Innovation and Choice Online Act (HR-3816/S-2992), the Journalism Competition and Preservation Act (HR-1735/S-673) and other Big Tech-focused bills “and get a vote on the Senate floor” on the package this year. Klobuchar and other lawmakers who support HR-1735/S-673 encouraged NAB members to press members of Congress to back a combined package, during a Monday event. NAB sees HR-1735/S-673 as one of its top 2022 priorities (see 2202110068), as members plan to meet with lawmakers Tuesday.
Differences in chips funding legislation in the House and Senate aren’t “irreconcilable” and are “worthy of discussion,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said Friday during a news conference at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California. She was referencing the House-passed America Creating Opportunities for Manufacturing, Pre-Eminence in Technology and Economic Strength Act (HR-4521) (see 2202040054). Pelosi's office didn’t comment about timing and participants for the conference committee. “We are almost there,” said Rep. Doris Matsui, D-Calif. “We know what we already agree on, which is the majority of it, and there’s some little tweaks” and other differences. “There’s nothing there that’s going to be a deal stopper at all. ... This is going to get done.” The U.S. in 1990 had a 37% global share of semiconductor manufacturing capacity, which has fallen to 12% today, she noted. Since the bill was introduced, similar legislation has passed in Korea, Taiwan, Japan, India and Europe, said Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger: “They want the fabs built on their own soil.”
President Joe Biden should demand changes to the EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA), which discriminates against U.S. tech companies, Reps. Suzan DelBene, D-Wash., and Darin LaHood, R-Ill., wrote Wednesday in a letter with some 30 other members of Congress. The group noted the administration has recently engaged with the EU to revise its proposed DMA ahead of potential adoption next month. Originally announced in 2020, the DMA regulates self-preferencing and other competition issues associated with Big Tech. It establishes a "set of narrowly defined objective criteria for qualifying a large online platform" as a gatekeeper. As drafted, the DMA would “single out” American companies by restricting their activity in Europe while favoring European companies, the lawmakers wrote in their letter. The EU’s approach “unfairly targets American workers by deeming certain U.S. technology companies as ‘gatekeepers’ based on deliberately discriminatory and subjective thresholds,” they wrote. The DMA’s discriminatory aspects violate “fundamental principles” of the World Trade Organization, they argued. Reps. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif.; Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill.; and Doris Matsui, D-Calif., signed. The White House didn’t comment.
Congressional Spectrum Caucus co-Chair Rep. Doris Matsui of California and seven other House Commerce Committee Democrats urged President Joe Biden Friday to quickly nominate a U.S. chief technology officer “to support the development and execution of the Administration’s spectrum” policy. The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy began searching for a CTO in December but has been “having a hard time clearing” a “list of potential” contenders for the role, said a communications sector lobbyist who follows Democratic talks. OSTP didn’t comment. “With the backing of the White House, a CTO can be a powerful force in ensuring the administration speaks with one voice on spectrum matters,” the Democrats wrote Biden. The U.S. is “on track for a successful rollout of 5G” in the C band, but “the significant dispute over its use demonstrates the ongoing need for meaningful coordination across the Federal government. To ensure agencies have the requisite resources to fulfill their mandates and to maintain U.S. leadership in next generation communications networks, it is imperative that the Federal government have a unified approach to spectrum policy.” House Transportation Committee members during a Thursday hearing (see 2202030081) cited breakdowns in federal interagency spectrum coordination as a primary cause of the C-band aviation safety fracas that preceded delays last month in AT&T's and Verizon's rollout of commercial 5G use on the frequency. The House Commerce members want Biden to “take action to bolster” NTIA’s “statutory role as manager of the federal government’s use of spectrum.” They noted former President Barack Obama’s 2013 spectrum sharing memo (see 1306170038) required all federal agencies to coordinate with NTIA before filing comments on spectrum policy matters to ensure a unified federal voice. “With Alan Davidson’s confirmation as NTIA Administrator, we believe there is an urgent need to revisit this memorandum and consider targeted ways to expand its scope to provide the agency with the Administration-backed authority it needs to fulfill its mandate,” the lawmakers said.