The FCC on Thursday approved 3-2 a three-year, $200 million cybersecurity pilot program for schools and libraries. Commissioners Brendan Carr and Nathan Simington dissented, as some had predicted (see 2406040039). The two cited concerns with the FCC using E-rate program funds for the effort. Commissioners Geoffrey Starks and Anna Gomez indicated changes were inserted into the pilot rules at their request.

FCC commissioners unanimously approved an NPRM Thursday proposing specific reporting requirements on the nation's largest broadband providers regarding their border gateway protocol (BGP) security practices. "What was meant to be a short-term solution developed on the sidelines of an internet engineering conference is still with us today," Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel said during the commissioners' open meeting. "While BGP has allowed network operators to grow and evolve the modern internet, it was not designed with explicit security features to ensure trust in exchanged information," Rosenworcel said. Also adopted was an NPRM proposing an update of the commission's letter of credit (LOC) rules for its USF high-cost programs serving rural communities and an NPRM changing low-power TV station rules.

The Universal Service Administrative Co.'s investigations of Essential Network Technologies and MetComm.Net and their eligibility to receive universal service fund reimbursements are "now complete," FCC counsel James Carr wrote the U.S. Appeals Court for the D.C. Circuit Tuesday (docket 24-1027). USAC has begun to notify the companies and the schools they serve “of any downward adjustments in universal service funding stemming from USAC’s findings in the investigations,” said Carr. USAC expects to complete this notification process within the next month, he said. The two companies petitioned the D.C. Circuit in February to order USAC to release the reimbursements they said they were due for IT and broadband services that they provided to schools under Section 254 of the Communications Act (see 2402200044). The FCC said in late April that USAC’s investigations stemmed from evidence that the companies and the schools they served “may have had a prohibited pre-existing relationship” before the schools awarded the companies their business (see 2404250028). Carr’s letter to the D.C. Circuit didn’t delve into USAC’s findings from those investigations.

Congressional leaders haven't reached a consensus on how to resurrect the FCC's expired affordable connectivity program. In interviews this week, lawmakers pointed to a range of options, including an expected third attempt at a Senate Commerce Committee markup next week (see [2405310070]) of the Spectrum and National Security Act (S-4207). The FCC formally shuttered ACP Friday after supporters on Capitol Hill failed numerous times at allocating stopgap funding (see 2403280001).

The House Appropriations Financial Services Subcommittee advanced its FY 2025 funding bill Wednesday with language that would couple an increase in the FCC’s annual funding with riders barring the commission from implementing GOP-opposed net neutrality and digital discrimination orders. The subpanel advanced the funding bill on a voice vote, but Democrats vowed to fight the FCC language and other riders when the measure reaches the full House Appropriations Committee. The measure also proposes cutting the FTC’s annual funding for FY25 from what lawmakers allocated the agency via a March FY24 minibus package (see 2403280001).

The Universal Service Administrative Co.'s investigations of Essential Network Technologies and MetComm.Net and their eligibility to receive universal service fund reimbursements are "now complete," FCC counsel James Carr wrote the U.S. Appeals Court for the D.C. Circuit Tuesday (docket 24-1027). USAC has begun to notify the companies and the schools they serve “of any downward adjustments in universal service funding stemming from USAC’s findings in the investigations,” said Carr. USAC expects to complete this notification process within the next month, he said. The two companies petitioned the D.C. Circuit in February to order USAC to release the reimbursements they said they were due for IT and broadband services that they provided to schools under Section 254 of the Communications Act (see 2402200044). The FCC said in late April that USAC’s investigations stemmed from evidence that the companies and the schools they served “may have had a prohibited pre-existing relationship” before the schools awarded the companies their business (see 2404250028). Carr’s letter to the D.C. Circuit didn’t delve into USAC’s findings from those investigations.

FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez told us during an exclusive Communications Daily Q&A that evaluating assessments made on consumers' bills as part of funding the Universal Service Fund is her top issue amid calls for contribution reform (see 2404190043). Sworn in in September, Gomez also mentioned concerns about USF's future and the affordable connectivity program. She also urged ISPs to create their digital equity plans with "intentionality."

The FCC’s Oct. 25 declaratory ruling authorizing E-rate funding for Wi-Fi on school buses (see 2312200040) was simply the commission’s response to requests to add to the list of services eligible for support under the E-rate program, the FCC’s 5th U.S. Circuit Appeals Court appellee brief said Monday (docket 23-60641) in support of the ruling.

The FCC’s Oct. 25 declaratory ruling authorizing E-rate funding for Wi-Fi on school buses (see 2312200040) was simply the commission’s response to requests to add to the list of services eligible for support under the E-rate program, the FCC’s 5th U.S. Circuit Appeals Court appellee brief said Monday (docket 23-60641) in support of the ruling.

The Detroit Public Library owes about $376,000 to IT contractor Ahead in the Cloud and hasn't responded to requests for payment, alleged the contractor's breach of contract complaint Wednesday (docket 2:24-cv-11424) in U.S. District Court for Eastern Michigan in Detroit. The parties agreed in March 2022 that Ahead, an E-rate-approved contractor, would provide and install security, internet and computer equipment to the library. The agreement called for funding to be provided by the DPL funds, along with receipt and reimbursement of federal funds from Universal Service Administrative Co. (USAC), including E-rate program funding, alleged the complaint. The parties agreed DPL was to pay Ahead and then seek “in whole or in part” reimbursement from USAC for costs incurred, it said. Ahead provided all of the internet communications, security and devices DPL requested, and DPL was to pay the plaintiff $468,948.41 for all work performed, the complaint said. On April 21, 2023, Ahead billed DPL $122,370.97, portions of which were reimbursable from USAC to DPL, said the complaint. Ahead submitted another bill for $298,286.06 in October, also partially reimbursable from USAC to DPL, it said. In February, Ahead received a payment of $44,742.91 from the defendant, leaving $375,914.12 due, the complaint said. Five follow-up letters and emails to DPL regarding payment have “gone unanswered,” the complaint said. The plaintiff seeks the amount due, plus legal costs, interest, and other fees and expenses allowed by law. The library didn't comment.