Industry disagreed whether the FCC should impose additional requirements on certain voice service providers to combat illegal robocalls (see 2207150053). Some agreed with a proposal to impose additional measures on intermediate providers, in comments posted Thursday in docket 17-97. Others sought flexibility as providers continue to implement Stir/Shaken caller ID authentication.

The FCC “reopened” for in-person meetings in June, but the agency hasn’t seen a wholesale return to them, and most meetings between staff and industry remain virtual, as they have been since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, based on a review of ex parte filings and interviews with lawyers and FCC officials. Some expect more in-person meetings starting after Labor Day, depending on what happens on COVID infection rates during August.

Industry groups asked the FCC to streamline its rules for its annual data collection of subscription rates and plans offered through the affordable connectivity program (ACP). Some said the FCC should rely on the forthcoming broadband consumer labels and raised privacy concerns if data is collected at the subscriber level in comments posted Tuesday in docket 21-450.

Industry disagreed whether the FCC should consider an Alternative Connect America Cost Model (ACAM) Broadband Coalition proposal to extend the program through increased deployment obligations in exchange for additional funding (see 2205190023). Some sought to expand eligibility to carriers receiving other high-cost USF support, in comments posted Tuesday in docket 10-90. Others said the FCC should defer new high-cost support until programs funded through the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act are completed.

Every state and territory applied for NTIA’s digital equity planning grant program, the agency announced Wednesday (see 2206160072). NTIA received letters of intent from "hundreds of tribal nations" to participate in the digital equity program. All states and territories also submitted a letter of intent for the $42.45 billion broadband, equity, access and deployment program by the July 18 deadline, NTIA said. Iowa and Florida were the last two states to sign on, per a tweet from NTIA Tuesday.

Broadcasters, MVPDs, ISPs and other entities argued over the state of competition in the broadband and video marketplaces and how to address it, in comments posted by Friday’s deadline in docket 22-203 for the agency’s biannual State of Competition in the Communications Marketplace report to Congress, due in Q4. Regulations premised on lack of competition “should be repealed,” said NCTA. The FCC “must consider the real-world consequences of imposing, in a highly competitive marketplace, a burdensome and outdated regulatory regime,” said NAB.

Industry groups and consumer advocacy organizations continued to disagree on the amount of digital discrimination in the broadband marketplace, in reply comments posted Friday in docket 22-69 (see 2205170071). Central to the disagreement was whether the FCC has the authority to consider a disparate impact standard rather than discriminatory intent in final rules.

Industry groups disagreed whether the FCC should adopt a new cost allocation framework and rules for pole replacements, in comments posted Tuesday in docket 17-84. The proceeding stems from a 2020 NCTA petition asking the FCC to clarify its pole replacement rules. The FCC adopted the Further NPRM in March in lieu of acting on the petition, noting the group “revealed inconsistent practices by utilities" on cost responsibility for pole replacements (see 2203180074).

By the end of 2025, more than 90% of U.S. households will have access to at least one broadband provider offering 100/20 Mbps service and at least one offering 25/3 Mbps service, ACA Connects said in a white paper Thursday. Citing FCC data and trend lines, it said 84% of households will have access to at least two providers offering 100/20 Mbps service. The paper said increased competition, plus FCC ability to regulate prices and speeds for broadband services it subsidizes, makes moot any supposed need "for common-carrier-style regulatory intervention." It said 7% of U.S. households are in areas served by a subsidized broadband provider, and the number of those households will grow in coming years due to the FCC's broadband equity, access and deployment program spending and other federal stimulus programs. ACA urged that even if there is common-carrier-style regulation on larger broadband providers, smaller operators should be exempt.

The FCC got a mixed response to a Competitive Carriers Association petition seeking FCC clarification that broadband data collection (BDC) filings can be certified by a qualified engineer who isn't a licensed professional engineer (PE) accredited by a state licensure board (see 2205170073). Replies were posted Thursday in docket 19-195. Many commenters support CCA but “they fail to show that a declaratory ruling is warranted or provide support for the argument that the public interest is served by relaxing the certification requirement,” the Rural Wireless Association said. CCA asked the FCC “to adopt a brand new definition” and “such a request must be made via a petition for rulemaking, which is subject to its own requirements and governed by the Administrative Procedure Act,” RWA said. Leave the requirement in place, said the Nebraska National Society of Professional Engineers. Similar government programs have similar requirements, the group said: “This is done to ensure that … projects are constructed in a manner that meets all local, state, federal and in some cases international, regulations and requirements. It also ensures that the networks are designed in such a way as to meet the speed and data rate performance requirements that the service provide[r]s are advertising.” NCTA supported CCA. NCTA said it “appreciates the need to ensure the accuracy of the mapping data submitted to the Commission [but] the individual most familiar with the preparation and development of that data and thus in the best position to certify to its accuracy may not have the requisite professional designation.” Most groups representing providers support CCA, the Wireless ISP Association said. Opponents “ignore the realities of the marketplace and conflate the requirements of building infrastructure with the more routine task of certifying network coverage based on parameters established by the Commission,” WISPA said. The current PE shortage “will result in many providers being unable to get the required engineering certification, and, consequently, being unable to make their BDC filings timely, if at all; or, incurring unduly burdensome costs to enlist a PE,” ACA Connects said. “The response to CCA’s petition by trade associations, broadband service providers, and individual commenters reflects widespread support for the Commission’s policy objectives, and a shared commitment to accurate and granular data collection as a crucial component of broadband deployment,” CCA said.