Hardware vendors are pivoting from traditional customer bases, hoping to land as a home-based option while Americans shelter in place during the COVID-19 crisis.
The World Customs Organization and the World Trade Organization will be working “closely together to minimize disruption to cross-border trade in goods -- in particular those essential to combat COVID-19 -- while safeguarding public health,” the groups said in a joint news release. “Within our respective mandates, we have already invited Members to increase transparency by sharing information on new trade and trade-related measures introduced in response to the COVID-19 pandemic,” they said. “To the extent appropriate, we are making such information publicly available through our respective websites. We are also willing to establish a coordinated approach in support of initiatives that facilitate cross-border trade in goods, in particular those key to combat COVID-19. This would allow that essential goods can quickly reach those most in need, including in least developed and land-locked countries.” Border measures meant to protect citizens should be temporary and rescinded “once they are no longer needed, especially if they restrict trade,” they said. “We welcome initiatives to facilitate and simplify cross-border procedures and urge our Members to prioritize those for exporting and importing essential goods.”
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of March 30 - April 5:
The World Customs Organization and the World Trade Organization will be working “closely together to minimize disruption to cross-border trade in goods -- in particular those essential to combat COVID-19 -- while safeguarding public health,” the groups said in a joint news release. “Within our respective mandates, we have already invited Members to increase transparency by sharing information on new trade and trade-related measures introduced in response to the COVID-19 pandemic,” they said. “To the extent appropriate, we are making such information publicly available through our respective websites. We are also willing to establish a coordinated approach in support of initiatives that facilitate cross-border trade in goods, in particular those key to combat COVID-19. This would allow that essential goods can quickly reach those most in need, including in least developed and land-locked countries.” Border measures meant to protect citizens should be temporary and rescinded “once they are no longer needed, especially if they restrict trade,” they said. “We welcome initiatives to facilitate and simplify cross-border procedures and urge our Members to prioritize those for exporting and importing essential goods.”
Litigation may be next for T-Mobile and the California Public Utilities Commission, after the carrier closed on buying Sprint without OK (see 2004010069). Assigned Commissioner Cliff Rechtschaffen ruled Wednesday that T-Mobile and Sprint may not combine California operations until after the PUC issues a final decision. Both carriers “have California subsidiaries that are public utility telephone corporations under state law, and subject to the jurisdiction of this agency,” so merging California operations needs commission OK, the commissioner wrote in docket A.18-07-011. T-Mobile didn’t comment Thursday. Litigation is certain, blogged Tellus Venture Associates President Steve Blum, predicting the carriers will ignore the order. “T-Mobile says its mobile business isn’t governed by California law. Rechtschaffen says it is, and it’s a good bet his fellow commissioners agree.” The agency “could sue to enforce its claimed jurisdiction over wireless mergers,” American Enterprise Institute Daniel Lyons blogged Thursday. “Even if it won, it would be difficult to unwind the merger.” Stakes “may be higher than simply California’s ability to attach conditions to the deal,” he said. “Other states may be satisfied with the law’s present ambiguity and have reason to fear a court battle that might limit state authority further.” Communications Workers of America slammed closing early, commenting to seek conditions to preserve jobs, current pay levels and employee rights. The California Emerging Technology Fund mostly supported the CPUC’s proposed conditional OK, asking the commission make the carriers' commitments to CETF enforceable and scale back some new proposed conditions. Proposed conditions aren’t enforceable and don’t mitigate anti-competitive effects, commented CPUC’s Public Advocates Office. They don’t protect universal service, said The Utility Reform Network. The deal would harm communities of color, said the Greenlining Institute.
Litigation may be next for T-Mobile and the California Public Utilities Commission, after the carrier closed on buying Sprint without OK (see 2004010069). Assigned Commissioner Cliff Rechtschaffen ruled Wednesday that T-Mobile and Sprint may not combine California operations until after the PUC issues a final decision. Both carriers “have California subsidiaries that are public utility telephone corporations under state law, and subject to the jurisdiction of this agency,” so merging California operations needs commission OK, the commissioner wrote in docket A.18-07-011. T-Mobile didn’t comment Thursday. Litigation is certain, blogged Tellus Venture Associates President Steve Blum, predicting the carriers will ignore the order. “T-Mobile says its mobile business isn’t governed by California law. Rechtschaffen says it is, and it’s a good bet his fellow commissioners agree.” The agency “could sue to enforce its claimed jurisdiction over wireless mergers,” American Enterprise Institute Daniel Lyons blogged Thursday. “Even if it won, it would be difficult to unwind the merger.” Stakes “may be higher than simply California’s ability to attach conditions to the deal,” he said. “Other states may be satisfied with the law’s present ambiguity and have reason to fear a court battle that might limit state authority further.” Communications Workers of America slammed closing early, commenting to seek conditions to preserve jobs, current pay levels and employee rights. The California Emerging Technology Fund mostly supported the CPUC’s proposed conditional OK, asking the commission make the carriers' commitments to CETF enforceable and scale back some new proposed conditions. Proposed conditions aren’t enforceable and don’t mitigate anti-competitive effects, commented CPUC’s Public Advocates Office. They don’t protect universal service, said The Utility Reform Network. The deal would harm communities of color, said the Greenlining Institute.
OneWeb's Chapter 11 filing could result in fundraising challenges for other broadband non-geostationary orbit constellation plans, NGSO experts told us. Some said it could stoke doubts about the mega-constellation-delivered broadband business model. The company said it's using bankruptcy as a way to buy time until global markets rebound from the COVID-19 slowdown so it can then sell itself.
Inconsistencies abound in the List 4A Section 301 tariff exclusions that the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative granted to Chinese smartwatch imports classified under the 8517.62.00.90 product code. The exclusions are retroactive to Sept. 1 when the tariffs took effect and expire after one year, said a USTR notice Thursday. The exemptions apply to devices “suitable for wearing on the wrist” with “time-display functions” and the ability to link to a “network." USTR granted exclusions to the Apple Watch and a range of Fitbit smartwatches and fitness trackers, but also to Tile for a Bluetooth tracking device that has no wrist-worn or time-display component. The Tile device links to a smartphone app for finding misplaced items like keys or glasses. Sonos also landed exemptions for the wireless mesh network speakers and audio components it imports from China under the same 8517.62.00.90 classification as smartwatches. But exclusion requests for wireless speakers from Bose, Sound United and others remain in a Stage 2 administrative review at USTR, as do smartwatches from Fossil. A wide range of additional 8517.62.00.90 goods also remain in a Stage 2 hold, including Apple AirPods and JLab Bluetooth headphones. USTR didn’t comment Friday.
Inconsistencies abound in the List 4A Section 301 tariff exclusions that the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative granted to Chinese smartwatch imports classified under the 8517.62.00.90 product code. The exclusions are retroactive to Sept. 1 when the tariffs took effect and expire after one year, said a USTR notice Thursday. The exemptions apply to devices “suitable for wearing on the wrist” with “time-display functions” and the ability to link to a “network." USTR granted exclusions to the Apple Watch and a range of Fitbit smartwatches and fitness trackers, but also to Tile for a Bluetooth tracking device that has no wrist-worn or time-display component. The Tile device links to a smartphone app for finding misplaced items like keys or glasses. Sonos also landed exemptions for the wireless mesh network speakers and audio components it imports from China under the same 8517.62.00.90 classification as smartwatches. But exclusion requests for wireless speakers from Bose, Sound United and others remain in a Stage 2 administrative review at USTR, as do smartwatches from Fossil. A wide range of additional 8517.62.00.90 goods also remain in a Stage 2 hold, including Apple AirPods and JLab Bluetooth headphones. USTR didn’t comment Friday.
Inconsistencies abound in the List 4A Section 301 tariff exclusions that the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative granted to Chinese smartwatch imports classified under the 8517.62.00.90 product code. The exclusions are retroactive to Sept. 1 when the tariffs took effect and expire after one year, said a USTR notice Thursday. The exemptions apply to devices “suitable for wearing on the wrist” with “time-display functions” and the ability to link to a “network." USTR granted exclusions to the Apple Watch and a range of Fitbit smartwatches and fitness trackers, but also to Tile for a Bluetooth tracking device that has no wrist-worn or time-display component. The Tile device links to a smartphone app for finding misplaced items like keys or glasses. Sonos also landed exemptions for the wireless mesh network speakers and audio components it imports from China under the same 8517.62.00.90 classification as smartwatches. But exclusion requests for wireless speakers from Bose, Sound United and others remain in a Stage 2 administrative review at USTR, as do smartwatches from Fossil. A wide range of additional 8517.62.00.90 goods also remain in a Stage 2 hold, including Apple AirPods and JLab Bluetooth headphones. USTR didn’t comment Friday.