The following lawsuits were recently filed at the Court of International Trade:
The International Trade Commission on Dec. 23 published a summary of administrative protective order (APO) breach investigations related to proceedings under title VII and section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 conducted during fiscal year 2024. The commission said that, over time, it has added to its report of breaches in proceedings other than title VII and violations of the ITC's rules, including the rule on bracketing business proprietary information.
The following lawsuits were recently filed at the Court of International Trade:
International Trade Today is providing readers with the top stories from last week in case they were missed. All articles can be found by searching on the titles or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.
The following lawsuits were recently filed at the Court of International Trade:
CBP issued the following releases on commercial trade and related matters:
The following lawsuits were recently filed at the Court of International Trade:
In response to importer Mitsubishi Power Americas’ motion for judgment, the U.S. filed a cross-motion for judgment saying the importers’ products are filters and don’t fall under the “basket provision” for other catalytic reactors (Mitsubishi Power Americas v. U.S., CIT #21-00573).
The Court of International Trade on Dec. 19 declined to grant victory to G&H Diversified Manufacturing on the importer's claims that CBP previously, as part of its role in granting a Section 232 duty exclusion, already said the company's imports were subject to the exclusion. Judge Timothy Reif said open questions of fact still exist with regard to the extent of CBP's role in the exclusion process.
The Court of International Trade on Dec. 19 declined to grant victory to G&H Diversified Manufacturing on the importer's claims that CBP previously, as part of its role in granting a Section 232 duty exclusion, already said the company's imports were subject to the exclusion. Judge Timothy Reif said open questions of fact still exist with regard to the extent of CBP's role in the exclusion process.