Political pressure in executive orders won’t sway the FTC, Chairman Joe Simons wrote June 29 to Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., and Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill. Blumenthal and Schakowsky wrote Simons June 15 with concerns about political influence from President Donald Trump’s EO (see 2005280060) directing the FTC to police unfair and deceptive practices involving online platforms’ content moderation practices, with language targeting Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. We received the correspondence via a Freedom of Information Act request to the trade commission.
Political pressure in executive orders won’t sway the FTC, Chairman Joe Simons wrote June 29 to Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., and Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill. Blumenthal and Schakowsky wrote Simons June 15 with concerns about political influence from President Donald Trump’s EO (see 2005280060) directing the FTC to police unfair and deceptive practices involving online platforms’ content moderation practices, with language targeting Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. We received the correspondence via a Freedom of Information Act request to the trade commission.
The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative will grant extensions to 12 exclusions from the first list of Section 301 tariffs on China that were due to expire July 9, it said in a notice. The 98 exclusions that weren't extended, all listed in U.S. Note 20(n) to subchapter III of chapter 99 and filed under subheading 9903.88.11, will expire July 9. The 12 extended exclusions will now expire Dec. 31, USTR said.
A three-judge panel at the Court of International Trade will hear a recently filed Section 232 challenge that opens a new front in the battle of steel importers against the tariffs. Maple Leaf Marketing (MLM), distributor of oil industry pipe that is exported from the U.S. to Canada for processing before being re-imported in improved form, says that CBP in April illegally expanded Section 232 tariffs to cover U.S. goods returned under subheading 9802.00.0050 (see 2004130056).
No new lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade, nor any appeals of CIT decisions filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, during the week of June 29 - July 5.
Export Compliance Daily is providing readers with some of the top stories for June 22-26 in case you missed them.
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of June 22-28:
The Commerce Department will reconsider its denial of Section 232 exclusions for an importer of steel pipe, after the Court of International Trade on June 25 granted the government’s request to be allowed to reopen and add to the administrative record Commerce had previously presented the court and revisit its decision.
The labor provisions of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement on free trade “don’t only apply to U.S. companies doing business in Mexico,” regulatory law expert Ignacio Sanchez with DLA Piper told a webinar Wednesday to prepare clients for the treaty that takes effect July 1. USMCA also applies to “any facility producing goods in Mexico” for import into the U.S., he said.
The labor provisions of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement on free trade “don’t only apply to U.S. companies doing business in Mexico,” regulatory law expert Ignacio Sanchez, with DLA Piper, told a webinar held June 24 to prepare clients for the treaty that takes effect July 1. USMCA also applies to “any facility producing goods in Mexico” for import into the U.S., he said.