Retaliatory tariffs for U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum were delayed again by India, the country's Department of Revenue said in a Sept. 17 notice. The tariffs are now set to take effect on Nov. 2. The retaliatory tariffs, first announced in May (see 1805180064), are aimed at agricultural products, motorcycles, steel products and phosphoric and boric acid, and are aimed at offsetting the $241 million in duties India expects its U.S. customers to pay on its steel and aluminum exports. The tariffs were originally expected in June, but have been delayed multiple times. Many of the items already face high tariffs -- walnuts are taxed at 100 percent, fresh apples at 50 percent, chickpeas at 60 percent, motorcycles at 100 percent -- but the actions would add 10 percent more to many ag products, 20 percent more to walnuts and almonds, and 50 percent more to motorcycles.
Customs Duty
A Customs Duty is a tariff or tax which a country imposes on goods when they are transported across international borders. Customs Duties are used to protect countries' economies, residents, jobs, and environments, by limiting the flow of imported merchandise, especially restricted and prohibited goods, into the country. The Customs Duty Rate is a percentage determined by the value of the article purchased in the foreign country and not based on quality, size, or weight.
The Trump administration should pursue a “plurilateral agreement among the world’s largest economies” to curb China’s allegedly unfair trade practices, commented IBM in docket USTR-2018-0026 in opposition to the third tranche of Section 301 tariffs on Chinese imports. IBM thinks that a global agreement with China’s “largest trade and investment partners” could help “establish broad new norms,” it said.
WPC Technologies filed a petition Sept. 5 with the Commerce Department and the International Trade Commission, asking for new antidumping duties on strontium chromate from Austria and France. Commerce will now decide whether to begin AD duty investigations on strontium chromate from the two countries. The subject merchandise is used as a corrosion-resistant pigment in paints and coatings, particularly for the protection of steel and aluminum.
The Section 232 quotas on steel and aluminum from certain countries and exclusions from the Section 232 tariffs are among the toughest procedural challenges CBP is facing in dealing with those trade remedies, CBP officials from the Base Metals Center of Excellence and Expertise recently told the American Institute for International Steel. AIIS said in its newsletter that the group's customs committee held a conference call on Sept. 6 with Center Director Africa Bell and other officials. CBP is in the process of making fixes to aid in the remedying of those problems, it said.
The Court of International Trade on Sept. 6 ruled against several petroleum importers seeking drawback on taxes and fees, finding CBP correctly denied the claims because the importers did not include amounts for merchandise processing fee, harbor maintenance tax and excise taxes. Following precedent set by the Federal Circuit over the past 20 years, CIT said the importers were required to file a complete claim within the three years after export, and that the complete claim must include the full amount of drawback requested.
The Commercial Customs Operations Advisory Committee (COAC) for CBP will next meet Oct. 3 in Washington, CBP said in a notice.
Continuing the “tit-for-tat tariff escalation” with China by enacting a third tranche of proposed Section 301 duties on $200 billion worth of Chinese imports “only serves to expand the harm to more U.S. economic interests, including farmers, families, businesses, and workers,” wrote the National Customs Brokers & Forwarders Association of America, the National Retail Federation and 148 other trade groups in a letter to U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer at the Sept. 6 deadline for comments in docket USTR-2018-0026. “Unilaterally imposing tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars in goods invites retaliation,” said the groups, which also included the National Association of Foreign-Trade Zones, the American Association of Exporters and Importers, the Information Technology Industry Council and the Telecommunications Industry Association. Implementing the first two rounds of tariffs July 6 and Aug. 23 “has not resulted in meaningful negotiations or concessions” from the Chinese, they said.
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of Aug. 27 - Sept. 2:
The Commerce Department issued notices in the Federal Register on its recently initiated antidumping and countervailing duty investigations on steel wheels 12 to 1.6 inches in diameter from China (A-570-090/C-570-091). The CV duty investigation covers entries Jan. 1, 2017, through Dec. 31, 2017. The AD duty investigation covers entries Jan. 1, 2018, through June 30, 2018.
The agreement between the U.S. and Mexico (see 1808270032) contains several changes related to customs processing as part of the market access chapter, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative said in a fact sheet about the deal. Among those are "new provisions for transparency in import licensing and export licensing procedures," the USTR said. The deal would also prohibit requiring "local distributors for importation" and applying import restrictions on used goods for remanufacturing. "Provisions for duty-free temporary admission of goods to cover shipping containers or other substantial holders used in the shipment of goods" would also be updated, the USTR said.