CBP issued the following releases on commercial trade and related matters:
Harmonized Tariff Schedule
The Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) is a reference manual that provides duty rates for almost every item that exists. It is a system of classifying and taxing all goods imported into the United States. The HTS is based on the international Harmonized System, which is a global standard for naming and describing trade products, and consists of a hierarchical structure that assigns a specific code and rate to each type of merchandise for duty, quota, and statistical purposes. The HTS was made effective on January 1, 1989, replacing the former Tariff Schedules of the United States. It is maintained by the U.S. International Trade Commission, but the Customs and Border Protection of the Department of Homeland Security is responsible for interpreting and enforcing the HTS.
Finished motors assembled in Mexico from three components from China are classifiable in subheading 8501.10.4060 and subject to the 25 percent tariffs under Section 301, CBP said in a Sept. 13 ruling modification. CBP reached the same conclusion as in the ruling being modified, NY N299096, but said that ruling was "incorrect as to the application of the NAFTA Marking Rules and the country of origin of the product." The original ruling request came from Johnson Electric in July, CBP said.
CBP issued the following releases on commercial trade and related matters:
Reclassifying Chinese imports into Harmonized Tariff Schedule codes for goods not exposed to Section 301 tariffs is perhaps the least understood, most underused strategy that companies can try for minimizing the duties’ impact, a UPS executive said during an Oct. 3 webinar on high-tech supply chains. “If you’re not participating in what that classification process looks like, you’re taking a risk, I would say, at a minimum,” said Ron Shepherd, vice president at UPS Trade Management Services.
CBP posted a new "reference guide" to the harmonized tariff schedule subheadings currently covered by the Section 301 25 percent tariffs. The guide simply lists the eight-digit subheadings subject to the tariffs and the partial exemptions at the 10-digit level.
The International Trade Commission issued Revision 12 to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule. The relatively comprehensive update implements as of Oct. 1 new provisions for wood products agreed to by the World Customs Organization, and adds new subheadings for pesticide-impregnated bed nets in Chapter 63. Other changes include new provisions for the third, $200 billion list of 10 percent Section 301 tariffs that took effect for goods from China beginning Sept. 24, as well as new exemptions for certain products from Section 201 safeguards on solar cells that took effect Sept. 19.
The Commerce Department issued a notice in the Federal Register on its recently initiated antidumping duty investigations on strontium chromate from Austria (A-433-813) and France (A-427-830).
Cases for iPads that allow for wireless charging through a separate charging base are not classifiable as “similar containers” under heading 4202, CBP said in a June 28 ruling. The ruling, HQ H287462, was in response to a request for further review of a protest filed by Dana Innovation, the parent company of Sonance. CBP liquidated such iPad cases in 4202.99.9000 with a 20 percent duty rate.
The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative is amending the list of goods from China newly subject to 10 percent Section 301 tariffs to remove frozen salmon and make conforming changes to subheadings covering wood. Effective Sept. 24, USTR is removing from the list subheadings 0304.81.10 and 0304.81.50, which cover frozen salmon, in order “to account fully for the extensive public comments and testimony previously provided” in the Section 301 investigation.
Two U.S. manufacturers seek the imposition of new antidumping and countervailing duties on aluminum wire and cable from China, they said in a petition filed with the Commerce Department and the International Trade Commission Sept. 21. Commerce will now decide whether to begin AD/CVD investigations, which could result in the imposition of permanent AD/CV duty orders and the assessment of AD and CV duties on importers.