It’s unlikely Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., could offer an amendment to keep the Earn It Act from undermining encryption for millions of Americans, encryption advocates said in interviews about Thursday’s Senate Judiciary Committee markup (see 2006250067). A victims advocate urged the committee to advance the bill, contending government action is the only way to get Big Tech to respond to rampant child exploitation.
Section 230
The Internet Association backed legislation Friday to block federal funds from being used to carry out President Donald Trump’s social media-related executive order (see 2006020071). Rep. Norma Torres, D-Calif., introduced the Defund Executive Orders that Suppress Free Speech Act (HR-7300) Monday. The EO “risks undermining the careful balance” struck with Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and the “important content moderation efforts IA members engage in every day for the benefit of their users,” said IA interim CEO Jon Berroya.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., told us he wants to debate encryption and Communications Decency Act Section 230 separately. But Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., told us he may seek to clarify at the July 2 markup how their Earn It Act affects encryption (see 2006230006). “I’m going to wait till the markup to determine exactly what amendments are necessary, but I think the impact of the bill on encryption has been way exaggerated and distorted, so if we can clarify it, we may do it,” Blumenthal said.
The Senate Commerce Committee’s divide over FCC approval of Ligado’s L-band plan was again on display Wednesday during a commission oversight hearing, as expected (see 2006230059). The issue also came up during a committee confirmation hearing for Commissioner Mike O'Rielly (see 2006160062). There was an even clearer partisan divide among committee members about President Donald Trump’s May executive order directing NTIA to petition the FCC for regulations defining the scope of Communications Decency Act Section 230 (see 2005280060). Senate Commerce also drilled into broadband funding proposals amid the ongoing push to include money in future COVID-19 aid legislation.
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act needs recalibration because Big Tech isn’t doing enough to combat disinformation, House Commerce Committee Democrats said Wednesday. Republicans suggested platforms provide more transparency about content moderation decisions, citing political bias. It was a hearing (see 2006110064) of the Communications and Consumer Protection subcommittees.
Senate Majority Whip John Thune, R-S.D., and Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, introduced legislation Wednesday that would alter Section 230 and repeal tech industry immunity from civil action brought by federal agencies, as expected (2006160059). The Platform Accountability and Consumer Transparency Act would exempt enforcement of federal civil laws from Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, so “online platforms cannot use it as a defense when federal regulators,” like the FTC and DOJ, “pursue civil actions for online activity.” The bill would amend Section 230 and require “large online platforms to remove court-determined illegal content and activity within 24 hours.” Thune and Schatz touted the bill’s attempt to increase transparency about content moderation. The bill would require “large online platforms to provide process protections to consumers by having a defined complaint system that processes reports and notifies users of moderation decisions within 14 days, and allows consumers to appeal.”
President Donald Trump appears slightly likelier to choose Brendan Carr over GOP Commissioner Mike O’Rielly as FCC chairman if he wins re-election and current commission head Ajit Pai steps aside, communications sector officials and lobbyists said in interviews. Carr’s edge is narrow enough that few people we spoke with discounted the prospect of O’Rielly prevailing or the possibility Trump could choose a non-FCC Republican.
The Senate Judiciary Committee is scheduled to mark up the Eliminating Abusive and Rampant Neglect of Interactive Technologies (Earn It) Act Thursday (see 2006190055), the panel announced Monday. Based on customary committee practice, agenda items are generally held over a week, according to a committee spokesperson. S-3398 would alter Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, exposing online platforms to civil liability for violating child sexual abuse material-related laws.
DOJ should scrutinize how Google’s ad platform dominance allows the platform to stifle conservative news organizations, Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., wrote Attorney General William Barr Monday. Blackburn asked DOJ to scrutinize Google’s “control over vast sectors of the Internet economy, from online advertising to online search.” She threatened big tech companies’ liability protection under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act: “Congress will act soon, and tech giants are on notice that they can no longer hide behind such immunities to silence speech or avoid antitrust enforcement.” DOJ and Google didn’t comment.
Expect “significant” proposed changes when the Senate Judiciary Committee marks up the Earn It Act, Sen. Richard Blumenthal told us Thursday (see 2006170063). “I’m ready for a markup, which will include some changes, some of them significant, to clarify the provisions in light of the feedback."