The satellite industry's slice of the connected car market won't be big, at least for the next decade, said Northern Sky Research analyst Dallas Kasaboski in a blog post Sunday: The number of land-mobile connected vehicles receiving broadband by satellite is expected to be small through 2025, with wireless and cellular coverage instead being dominant. NSR said satellite's challenges include signal decay limiting its effectiveness, while weather and vehicle speed issues necessitate rugged, expensive antennas. Also making competition difficult is the near ubiquity of terrestrial services, it said. NSR said while numerous partnerships between mobile operators and the auto industry have been announced, there have been few such talks between the auto world and satellite service providers. "OEM deals are key factors to enable satellite-based connectivity in cars," NSR said. Antenna manufacturers haven't focused on connected cars, seeing it "as very niche with little potential," it said, adding there's a bigger focus on providing connected vehicle capability for high-speed railways. Dual-mode devices that switch between terrestrial mobile and satellite networks and are integrated directly into vehicle manufacture "will allow satcom to ride along with the success of terrestrially-connected vehicles, while proposing an added value proposition for use in remote environments," NSR said, though it added an integrated billing system could be difficult. "It will be necessary if satcom is to make a play with network-agnostic passengers in the connected car market," said the researcher.
Virginia moved closer to enacting small-cells wireless siting legislation last week as several other states consider a flurry of legislation backed by industry to rein in local charges and application processing times. Thursday, the Virginia House Commerce and Labor Committee cleared a Senate bill (SB-1282) with a substitute amendment, and the full House probably will vote on it Tuesday, a committee spokesman told us. Local governments are watching about 10 states for bills pushed by the wireless industry, all while the FCC mulls federal action, NATOA Executive Director Steve Traylor said in an interview. Localities want to build out 5G services but would rather negotiate directly with industry without the specter of pending regulation or legislation, said Best Best law firm's Gerry Lederer.
The Arizona Corporation Commission approved an order to align Lifeline eligibility requirements with FCC updates to the low-income program. Commissioners cleared the order as part of the consent agenda at their Tuesday meeting. The commission also ordered Arizona eligible telecom carriers to remove Link Up from Arizona tariffs, except for ETCs receiving high-cost support on tribal lands. “All Arizona ETCs are expected to keep current with and to comply with all FCC rules and regulations governing the provision of Lifeline services,” the commission said in the Jan. 25 proposed decision.
The Arizona Corporation Commission approved an order to align Lifeline eligibility requirements with FCC updates to the low-income program. Commissioners cleared the order as part of the consent agenda at their Tuesday meeting. The commission also ordered Arizona eligible telecom carriers to remove Link Up from Arizona tariffs, except for ETCs receiving high-cost support on tribal lands. “All Arizona ETCs are expected to keep current with and to comply with all FCC rules and regulations governing the provision of Lifeline services,” the commission said in the Jan. 25 proposed decision.
The Trump administration hasn't contacted FCC Inspector General David Hunt and Commerce Department IG Peggy Gustafson about the possibility of removing them from their positions, they told Senate Commerce Committee ranking member Bill Nelson, D-Fla., in letters dated from this week and provided to us Wednesday by a Nelson spokesman. But the administration told some IGs they would be held over only temporarily, some IGs told Nelson. Senate Commerce held a hearing focused on IGs Wednesday, with testimony from Gustafson, confirmed to the position in December, as well as Homeland Security Department IG John Roth, Transportation Department IG Calvin Scovel and National Science Foundation IG Allison Lerner.
The Trump administration hasn't contacted FCC Inspector General David Hunt and Commerce Department IG Peggy Gustafson about the possibility of removing them from their positions, they told Senate Commerce Committee ranking member Bill Nelson, D-Fla., in letters dated from this week and provided to us Wednesday by a Nelson spokesman. But the administration told some IGs they would be held over only temporarily, some IGs told Nelson. Senate Commerce held a hearing focused on IGs Wednesday, with testimony from Gustafson, confirmed to the position in December, as well as Homeland Security Department IG John Roth, Transportation Department IG Calvin Scovel and National Science Foundation IG Allison Lerner.
Streamlined procedures for telecom projects should apply to all federal lands and properties, CTIA commented to the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. The association mostly supported ACHP proposals from a draft program comment issued Jan. 13, saying many of the proposals would speed wireless deployment on federal lands while protecting religious, historic and cultural areas. The proposals don’t cover all federal lands and properties, CTIA said. The ACHP should clarify that the National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 individual site review process won’t be required for undertakings determined not to have adverse effect, it said. ACHP should add exclusions for tower/structure removal and road maintenance projects that won’t have adverse impact on historic properties, it said. “Wireless providers have often faced delays in seeking to deploy network infrastructure on federal lands and properties,” CTIA said. “Those delays can be substantial, impairing service even when the agencies and their employees would directly benefit from more robust and reliable broadband. The delays are not caused by the effect of new wireless facilities on historic properties; indeed many times, there are no historic properties that are even potentially affected. Instead, the delays often result from different agencies having different procedures for reviewing those facilities, or from lacking clearly defined procedures.”
The FCC invited input on a Hawaii agency request for guidance on a Sandwich Isles exclusive license and whether it conflicts with a federal mandate against barriers to competitive telecom entry. Comments are due Feb. 20. replies Feb. 27, on a Department of Hawaiian Home Lands letter, said a Wireline Bureau public notice posted Tuesday in docket 10-90. The DHHL said Thursday it's "deeply troubled" by FCC findings that Sandwich Isles violated agency rules "to secure excessive and unwarranted USF support," and said it understood that if a study-area waiver is terminated, the company would be ineligible for subsidies. DHHL asked "that care be taken so that native Hawaiian homesteaders and other subscribers located on Hawaiian home lands are not inadvertently harmed in the process." DHHL said any Sandwich Isles' wrongdoing should be addressed without cutting USF support for broadband/telecom services to home land residents. Competition from other providers "may be viable in limited areas," but the agency believes "for the foreseeable future USF support will be needed in substantial areas" of the home lands. It sought guidance on whether an exclusive license it gave Sandwich Isles Communications (SIC) in 1995 is a potential barrier to competitive entry under Section 253(a) of the Communications Act. Meanwhile, the FCC's December notice of apparently liability and forfeiture order (see 1612060032) proposing a $49 million fine "is without merit, contrary to the record factual evidence, legally wrong and must be set aside," SIC said in a response posted Monday. SIC said the FCC didn't issue one of the public notices it promised in asking the company to show cause why its USF eligibility shouldn't be revoked and study-area waiver retroactively denied. The basis "for these proposed draconian actions is nowhere spelled out but is presumably predicated upon the alleged conduct of SIC and its former principal," the company said. "The conduct that is complained of will not support the massive forfeiture proposed," it said. "There is no basis for the imposition of even more severe penalties." In recent weeks, there have been more than 1,000 fillings (some with multiple signatures) in docket 10-90 from Hawaiians voicing support for SIC's waiver and concern about FCC actions.
The FCC invited input on a Hawaii agency request for guidance on a Sandwich Isles exclusive license and whether it conflicts with a federal mandate against barriers to competitive telecom entry. Comments are due Feb. 20. replies Feb. 27, on a Department of Hawaiian Home Lands letter, said a Wireline Bureau public notice posted Tuesday in docket 10-90. The DHHL said Thursday it's "deeply troubled" by FCC findings that Sandwich Isles violated agency rules "to secure excessive and unwarranted USF support," and said it understood that if a study-area waiver is terminated, the company would be ineligible for subsidies. DHHL asked "that care be taken so that native Hawaiian homesteaders and other subscribers located on Hawaiian home lands are not inadvertently harmed in the process." DHHL said any Sandwich Isles' wrongdoing should be addressed without cutting USF support for broadband/telecom services to home land residents. Competition from other providers "may be viable in limited areas," but the agency believes "for the foreseeable future USF support will be needed in substantial areas" of the home lands. It sought guidance on whether an exclusive license it gave Sandwich Isles Communications (SIC) in 1995 is a potential barrier to competitive entry under Section 253(a) of the Communications Act. Meanwhile, the FCC's December notice of apparently liability and forfeiture order (see 1612060032) proposing a $49 million fine "is without merit, contrary to the record factual evidence, legally wrong and must be set aside," SIC said in a response posted Monday. SIC said the FCC didn't issue one of the public notices it promised in asking the company to show cause why its USF eligibility shouldn't be revoked and study-area waiver retroactively denied. The basis "for these proposed draconian actions is nowhere spelled out but is presumably predicated upon the alleged conduct of SIC and its former principal," the company said. "The conduct that is complained of will not support the massive forfeiture proposed," it said. "There is no basis for the imposition of even more severe penalties." In recent weeks, there have been more than 1,000 fillings (some with multiple signatures) in docket 10-90 from Hawaiians voicing support for SIC's waiver and concern about FCC actions.
Flat panel antenna (FPA) sales should hit $9.1 billion by 2026, with the market dominated by fixed broadband services from non-geostationary satellites, and revenue growth being driven primarily by aeronautical equipment, said Northern Sky Research Monday in a news release. NSR said antenna prices will remain high due to the technical complexity of FPAs for mobile applications. It said the in-flight connectivity, leisure maritime and land-mobile government markets mean mobile applications will generate more than 92 percent of FPA equipment revenue by 2026. The researcher said most fixed applications will be the delivery of satellite broadband services to more than 2 million lower-priced FPAs, primarily in Asia and the Middle East, by 2026.