There isn’t a “coherent” strategy among the various bills in Congress to address international technology competition, said Jon Bateman, a technology policy expert with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Bateman, speaking during a June 23 event hosted by Foreign Policy magazine, said the lack of coherence isn’t “altogether surprising, partly because the government is “classically plagued with coherence problems.”
Export Compliance Daily is providing readers with the top stories from last week in case you missed them. You can find any article by searching the title or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.
Paul Rosen, President Joe Biden's nominee to head the Treasury Department’s foreign investment screening efforts (see 2203090015), said he will continue to prioritize U.S. reviews of China-related transactions and wants to better encourage companies to submit voluntary filings. If confirmed, Rosen also said, he will focus on helping allies bolster their own investment screening regimes.
Companies are increasingly choosing to voluntarily file with the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. to avoid being caught up in CFIUS’s non-notified transaction process, CFIUS lawyers and experts said. That trend, combined with faster CFIUS clearances, could mean an increase in CFIUS filings this year, they said.
The House voted 222-210 last week to pass its China competition bill, which includes a variety of provisions that could expand U.S. export controls, sanctions and investment screening authorities. Although the America Competes Act faced objections from Republicans who argued it wasn’t tough enough on China and didn’t include strong enough export control measures (see 2202020039), several provisions could lead to more China sanctions and further restrict exports of critical American technologies.
Lawmakers submitted a host of amendments to the House’s recently released China competition bill, including measures that would introduce new export controls and sanctions authorities and requirements. One submission, a 115-page amendment from Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, would create more congressional oversight of the Commerce Department’s emerging and foundational technology control effort and calls for expanded export restrictions against Chinese military companies.
The U.S. should try to use existing tools to better screen outbound investments rather than create a new investment regime, which could burden American companies and damage U.S. competitiveness, two former U.S. officials and an international investment expert said. But one member of a bipartisan congressional commission said a new outbound investment regime is necessary to better protect U.S. critical technologies and national security.
Export Compliance Daily is providing readers with the top stories for Nov. 29 - Dec. 3 in case you missed them. You can find any article by searching the title or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.
The Senate is “likely” to vote on the annual defense policy bill this week, which could include the Senate-passed U.S. Innovation and Competition Act of 2021, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said. In a Nov. 14 letter to lawmakers, Schumer said “there seems to be fairly broad” bipartisan support for adding USICA to the National Defense Authorization Act, which would allow a USICA negotiation with the House “to be completed alongside” the NDAA before the end of the year. The House plans to write its own version of USICA.
A Senate bill with bipartisan support would expand which deals involving sensitive personal U.S. data must be declared to the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. The Protecting Sensitive Personal Data Act, introduced this month by Sens. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., and Raphael Warncok, D-Ga., would require mandatory declarations for investments that involve a range of personal data information, including genetic test results, health conditions, insurance applications, financial hardship data, security clearance information, geolocation data, private emails, data for generating government identification and credit report information. Warnock said “foreign entities” are investing in U.S. companies to “exploit” this data. “We need to strengthen CFIUS’s oversight authority of these transactions to protect Americans and mitigate this serious national security threat,” Rubbio said.