The FCC would bolster its statutory authority to regulate net neutrality, and help undergird the ability to parcel out USF money for broadband, by deciding for another year that Web service isn’t being sufficiently deployed, said agency and industry officials. They said in interviews last week that a negative finding over reasonable and timely deployment of broadband service in the annual Communications Act Section 706 report wouldn’t likely be required for net neutrality and USF broadband authority. That’s under last month’s 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling upholding FCC authority over broadband USF (WID May 27 p6) and January’s D.C. Circuit remand of net neutrality rules.

The FCC would bolster its statutory authority to regulate net neutrality, and help undergird the ability to parcel out USF money for broadband, by deciding for another year that Web service isn’t being sufficiently deployed, said agency and industry officials. They said in interviews last week that a negative finding over reasonable and timely deployment of broadband service in the annual Communications Act Section 706 report wouldn’t likely be required for net neutrality and USF broadband authority. That’s under last month’s 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling upholding FCC authority over broadband USF (CD May 27 p1) and January’s D.C. Circuit remand of net neutrality rules.

A bipartisan group of House lawmakers asked the FCC to revamp the E-rate program. The lawmakers sent a letter Monday signed by 46, 38 belonging to the New Democrat Coalition. “Focus E-rate on broadband services, Wi-Fi updates, and filling the infrastructure gap, with continued support for connectivity services, to ensure universal access to the most up to date technology” and ensure E-rate participants pay for “the best service at the lowest price” through competitive Internet service offerings and purchaser coordination, the lawmakers urged. They also back increasing E-rate’s transparency, accountability and funding stability, with an application process that’s simplified and streamlined. The New Democrat Coalition helped drive the letter forward, a Democratic aide familiar with the coalition’s effort told us. Coalition Chair Ron Kind, D-Wis., and member Jared Polis, D-Colo., spearheaded the letter within the coalition, the aide said. He said Reps. Charlie Dent, R-Pa., and Chris Gibson, R-N.Y., were “instrumental” in gathering Republican signatures. Expect the letter to be the first step in a broader New Democrat Coalition digital literacy focus, the aide said, citing strong coalition member interest since a presentation on the relevant data a few months back.

A bipartisan group of House lawmakers asked the FCC to revamp the E-rate program. They sent a letter Monday signed by 46, 38 belonging to the New Democrat Coalition. “Focus E-rate on broadband services, Wi-Fi updates, and filling the infrastructure gap, with continued support for connectivity services, to ensure universal access to the most up to date technology” and ensure E-rate participants pay for “the best service at the lowest price” through competitive Internet service offerings and purchaser coordination, the lawmakers urged. They also back increasing E-rate’s transparency, accountability and funding stability, with an application process that’s simplified and streamlined. The New Democrat Coalition helped drive the letter forward, a Democratic aide familiar with the coalition’s effort told us. Coalition Chairman Ron Kind, D-Wis., and member Jared Polis, D-Colo., spearheaded the letter within the coalition, the aide said. He said Reps. Charlie Dent, R-Pa., and Chris Gibson, R-N.Y., were “instrumental” in gathering Republican signatures. Expect the letter to be the first step in a broader New Democrat Coalition digital literacy focus, the aide said, citing strong coalition member interest since a presentation on the relevant data a few months back.

Using Title II of the Communications Act to ensure nondiscrimination on the Internet wouldn’t work, would lead to massive litigation and would be a “ticking time bomb” that would reverberate throughout the Internet ecosystem, said panelists at a Thursday FCBA event. It would also raise thorny USF issues as regulators try to determine which high-tech companies should pay into the fund if broadband becomes a telecom service and thus regulated under Title II, some said. But not everyone agreed that Title II classification would lead to the suggested parade of horribles.

Using Title II of the Communications Act to ensure nondiscrimination on the Internet wouldn’t work, would lead to massive litigation and would be a “ticking time bomb” that would reverberate throughout the Internet ecosystem, said panelists at a Thursday FCBA event. It would also raise thorny USF issues as regulators try to determine which high-tech companies should pay into the fund if broadband becomes a telecom service and thus regulated under Title II, some said. But not everyone agreed that Title II classification would lead to the suggested parade of horribles.

The FCC scored a court victory Friday as a three-judge panel held unanimously that petitioners were “unpersuasive” in their “host of challenges” to the 2011 USF/intercarrier compensation order (http://1.usa.gov/1r18uaa). The 31 consolidated petitions for review were denied by the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. It’s a validation of the agency’s power to condition the receipt of USF money on the promise of broadband buildout. The decision also affirms the agency’s authority over access charges on all telecom traffic. NARUC General Counsel Brad Ramsay told us he'd be “stunned” if no one appealed this to the Supreme Court, something others predicted (CD Nov 21 p6) after almost five hours of USF oral argument in November.

The FCC scored a court victory Friday as a three-judge panel held unanimously that petitioners were “unpersuasive” in their “host of challenges” to the 2011 USF/intercarrier compensation order (http://1.usa.gov/1r18uaa). The 31 consolidated petitions for review “are denied,” wrote the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. It’s a validation of the agency’s power to condition the receipt of USF money on the promise of broadband buildout. The decision also affirms the agency’s authority over access charges on all telecom traffic. NARUC General Counsel Brad Ramsay told us he'd be “stunned” if no one appealed this to the Supreme Court, something others predicted after almost five hours of USF oral argument in November.

The bitcoin wallet service Coinbase is giving away $10 of bitcoin to college students, said a company blog post (http://bit.ly/RF4oEz) Wednesday. The giveaway is available to students in the “top 500 universities worldwide,” with corresponding .edu domain names, it said. Domain names with the most signups include illinois.edu (496), utexas.edu (290) and berkeley.edu (232), it said. The bitcoin promotion follows a similar strategy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Bitcoin Club, which raised the funds to give $100 of bitcoin to all 4,528 of MIT’s undergraduates, said a press release (http://bit.ly/1mTYSeu) last month.

The Universal Service Administrative Co. computer systems are not up to the task of effectively making available all the data it receives on E-rate demand and what services cost for various schools and libraries, panelists at a Schools, Health and Libraries Broadband Coalition event said Thursday. This makes it hard for school administrators and librarians to ensure they're getting the “lowest corresponding price” on services, panelists and audience members said. Panelists also expressed frustration at the political compromises that led to a Priority 2 funding system that has run out of money.