The FCC approved 3-1 an order to further relax telecom service discontinuance duties and related regulatory processes in an effort to remove barriers and encourage the industry shift from legacy wireline to next-generation, IP-based offerings. Commissioners also voted 4-0 to adopt an order to relieve certain rural telcos of USF contribution obligations on their broadband services to equalize their treatment with other carriers and promote affordability. Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel largely dissented on the discontinuance order and concurred on the rural telco USF order.

The FCC approved 3-1 an order to further relax telecom service discontinuance duties and related regulatory processes in an effort to remove barriers and encourage the industry shift from legacy wireline to next-generation, IP-based offerings. Commissioners also voted 4-0 to adopt an order to relieve certain rural telcos of USF contribution obligations on their broadband services to equalize their treatment with other carriers and promote affordability. Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel largely dissented on the discontinuance order and concurred on the rural telco USF order.

The House Natural Resources Committee advanced the Rural Broadband Permitting Efficiency Act Wednesday. HR-4824, from Rep. John Curtis, R-Utah, would streamline federal broadband permitting processes by requiring the Department of Agriculture to create a program that would sign memorandums of understanding with state governments to delegate them with permitting of broadband projects in operational rights of way. HR-4824 would require the Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management designate broadband projects in existing operational rights of way as categorical exclusions under the National Environmental Policy Act. The bill “will empower States and Tribal governments to more efficiently bring this resource to rural communities and help spur economic development in these areas,” Curtis said. CTIA Senior Vice President-Government Affairs Kelly Cole said it would “streamline federal siting, accelerate deployment of wireless infrastructure in rural areas, and help close the digital divide."

The House Natural Resources Committee advanced the Rural Broadband Permitting Efficiency Act Wednesday. HR-4824, from Rep. John Curtis, R-Utah, would streamline federal broadband permitting processes by requiring the Department of Agriculture to create a program that would sign memorandums of understanding with state governments to delegate them with permitting of broadband projects in operational rights of way. HR-4824 would require the Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management designate broadband projects in existing operational rights of way as categorical exclusions under the National Environmental Policy Act. The bill “will empower States and Tribal governments to more efficiently bring this resource to rural communities and help spur economic development in these areas,” Curtis said. CTIA Senior Vice President-Government Affairs Kelly Cole said it would “streamline federal siting, accelerate deployment of wireless infrastructure in rural areas, and help close the digital divide."

A March FCC order on wireless infrastructure attracted reconsideration petitions this week from localities, a major American Indian tribe and a tower company in docket 17-79. NATOA said the order isn’t in the public interest, fails to acknowledge existing limits and ignores impact of dense deployments in small areas, among other problems. It “will inflict serious injury” on tribes, said the Apache Tribe of Oklahoma. The move is a “step forward,” but the FCC should have stepped further, said T-Mobile unit and tower company PTA-FLA. Residents of Montgomery County, Maryland, also sought reconsideration due to concerns including about possible radiation from RF emissions.

It's not clear that the president's authorities under Section 232 allow for the elimination of drawback, law firm Neville Peterson said in a blog post. President Donald Trump said in April that drawback would not be allowed for entries subject to the Section 232 tariffs (see 1804300064). "While this is a close question, the President’s power under Section 232 is limited to 'adjust[ing] imports,'” the law firm said. "It seems unlikely that the President can take action respecting exports, the activity which generally triggers claims for duty drawback."

Several net neutrality advocates don't plan to seek a stay of the FCC order undoing Communications Act Title II broadband service regulation. They told us Tuesday they aren't aware of any who will seek a stay, with the order to take effect Monday. Some have warned that Monday will mark the start of declines in internet freedom, which Republicans and other net neutrality deregulation backers say is overblown and untrue.

Several net neutrality advocates don't plan to seek a stay of the FCC order undoing Communications Act Title II broadband service regulation. They told us Tuesday they aren't aware of any who will seek a stay, with the order to take effect Monday. Some have warned that Monday will mark the start of declines in internet freedom, which Republicans and other net neutrality deregulation backers say is overblown and untrue.

The FCC proposal to bar USF spending on products or services from companies seen as posing a national security risk is meeting with mixed reaction, with disagreements about whether rules should be limited to USF-funded equipment and services or should have broader reach, recent docket 18-89 comments show. Huawei called the rulemaking launched in April (see 1804170038) an "improper and imprudent" blacklist, and some critics questioned the efficacy of the proposed approach. Comments were due Friday, replies July 2.

The FCC proposal to bar USF spending on products or services from companies seen as posing a national security risk is meeting with mixed reaction, with disagreements about whether rules should be limited to USF-funded equipment and services or should have broader reach, recent docket 18-89 comments show. Huawei called the rulemaking launched in April (see 1804170038) an "improper and imprudent" blacklist, and some critics questioned the efficacy of the proposed approach. Comments were due Friday, replies July 2.