The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of May 11-17:
International Trade Today is providing readers with some of the top stories for May 11-15 in case they were missed.
CBP will begin processing refunds for some substitution drawback claims involving internal revenue taxes, after the Court of International Trade on May 15 denied the government’s motion to stay its recent decision invalidating portions of CBP’s drawback regulations, pending an appeal to the Federal Circuit.
A domestic labor union filed petitions on May 12 with the Commerce Department and the International Trade Commission requesting new antidumping duty investigations on passenger vehicle and light truck tires from South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam, and new countervailing duties on the same product from Vietnam. Commerce will now decide whether to begin AD/CVD investigations on passenger vehicle and light truck tires that could eventually result in the assessment of AD/CV duties.
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of May 4-10:
Export Compliance Daily is providing readers with some of the top stories for April 27 - May 1 in case you missed them.
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of April 27 - May 3:
The Department of Justice pulled back from a brief foray into ongoing antidumping and countervailing duty cases on mattresses April 30, withdrawing its recent “statement of interest” that urged the International Trade Commission to consider the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic as it approaches its preliminary injury determination in the proceedings.
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of April 20-26:
The Department of Justice recently interceded in an antidumping and countervailing duty case on mattresses to warn that imposition of new tariffs could run counter to efforts to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. In a brief filed April 22 with the International Trade Commission, lawyers from DOJ’s Antitrust Division argued that new AD/CV duties could increase the price of mattresses, making it harder for hospitals to increase the number of beds they have available for patients with the disease.