Some wireless industry officials came away disappointed from CTIA’s 5G Summit Thursday (see 1904040048) that FCC Chairman Ajit Pai didn’t offer new details or make a more explicit commitment on the C band. CTIA President Meredith Baker said at the event the band offers the best opportunity for making more mid-band spectrum available quickly. Pai, who spoke at the end, said the FCC is looking closely at the band and repeated earlier comments that it’s unusually complicated. Pai said he was still “sitting down with engineers, economists and lawyers” working through the future of the band.
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of March 25-31:
International Trade Today is providing readers with some of the top stories for March 25-29 in case they were missed.
The Express Association of America pointed to several specific regulatory changes it would like to see CBP make, in its follow-up comments on the agency's efforts to modernize the customs framework. The EAA comments are the only ones posted since CBP reopened the comment period (see 1903110039) following a March 1 meeting on the subject (see 1903040023). Among other things, EAA said the "current drawback regulations do not support the modern B2C/e-commerce environment."
China overhauled its e-commerce regulations in recent months, upping its de minimis level and adding new responsibilities for logistics providers and foreign suppliers, and also adopted new regulations on foreign medical device facility inspections. Meanwhile, China's General Administration of Customs has recently set new requirements for bonded zones and set lower value-added tax rates for some products. The following is an update on recent customs and trade-related actions by China:
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of March 18-24:
An appeal of the Court of International Trade’s recent decision finding Section 232 duties constitutional will be filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to avoid any distraction caused by the government’s likely opposition to a direct appeal to the Supreme Court, said Alan Morrison, a George Washington University law professor and the American Institute for International Steel’s lead counsel in the case. A three-judge CIT panel on March 25 ruled against the trade group and a pair of steel importers in their challenge to the Section 232 tariffs imposed in 2018 on iron and steel, finding itself bound by four-decade-old precedent that held Section 232 duties are not an excessive delegation of power (see 1903250032). “We think that a direct appeal to the Supreme Court is possible, but it would [be] opposed by the Government and therefore be a distraction,” Morrison said. The AIIS initially requested the three-judge panel because it would allow a direct Supreme Court appeal (see 1806270036).
The Northern Illinois U.S. District Court on March 19 dismissed a False Claims Act duty evasion lawsuit against a now-bankrupt pipe company, but allowed the case against that company’s two owners to proceed. Larry and Dennis Greenspon allegedly had their company, LDR Industries, falsely declare imports of plumbing pipe as exempt from antidumping and countervailing duties on circular welded pipe from China, and also should have paid marking duties on the imports, the lawsuit says.
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of March 11-17:
FCC Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel dissented on a Further NPRM proposing vertical accuracy standards for wireless calls indoors to 911. Commissioner Geoffrey Starks voted yes in part and concurred in part. The questions were expected (see 1903140043). The FNPRM proposes a vertical location accuracy metric, or z-axis, of plus or minus 3 meters for 80 percent of indoor wireless calls to 911.