The U.S. and importer Mirror Metals filed a stipulated judgment on agreed facts in which the government agreed not to apply 25% Section 232 tariffs to the importer’s steel articles (Mirror Metals v. United States, CIT #21-00144).
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of Jan. 27 - Feb. 2:
The following lawsuits have been filed recently at the Court of International Trade:
Responding to a request by the court, multiple parties filed four different briefs addressing the impact of Loper Bright on litigation regarding the use of a differential pricing analysis in a Canadian lumber review (Government of Canada v. United States, CIT Consol. # 23-00187).
The following new lawsuit was filed recently at the Court of International Trade:
FCC Chairman Brendan Carr expected CBS to give in to the agency’s request for an unedited transcript of a 60 Minutes interview with Vice President Kamala Harris by the end of day Monday, he said in a Monday morning Fox interview. “It's due today, and I expect CBS to provide it by the end of the day, to see what in fact was said as part of our own news distortion investigation,” Carr said.
No lawsuits have been filed recently at the Court of International Trade.
CBP agreed to return the liquidation status of 830 softwood lumber entries of importer Fraserview Remanufacturing to unliquidated while it awaits further instructions from the Commerce Department on how to treat the entries following the relevant antidumping duty and countervailing duty proceedings. The U.S. and Fraserview filed a stipulation for entry of judgment at the Court of International Trade in the importer's case against CBP's erroneous designation of the entries as deemed liquidated (Fraserview Remanufacturing v. United States, CIT # 23-00063).
The following new lawsuits have been filed recently at the Court of International Trade:
The U.S. and a defendant-intervenor each filed a response Jan. 28 to Chinese steel rack exporter Nanjing Dongsheng Shelf Manufacturing, which is challenging the denial of a separate rate in an antidumping duty review due to a missed deadline. The defending parties said Dongsheng failed to show extraordinary circumstances justified its error (Nanjing Dongsheng Shelf Manufacturing Co. v. U.S., CIT # 24-00085).