The Commerce Department issued its final determinations in its countervailing duty investigations on corrosion-resistant steel products from Brazil (C-351-863), Canada (C-122-872), Mexico (C-201-864) and Vietnam (C-552-844), after finding countervailable subsidization of producers and exporters in the four countries in the preliminary determinations of its CVD investigations.
Parents who allege Google's education products secretly harvest mass amounts of student information and data without knowledge or consent continued hurling accusations at the technology giant.
Attorney General Letitia James (D) and the National Retail Federation (NRF) continue to fight over whether a New York law requiring that retailers disclose when they are using algorithmic pricing is a violation of the First Amendment. In court documents filed Thursday, James emphasized the Algorithmic Disclosure Act doesn't halt algorithmic pricing, but requires that companies post a clear notice informing consumers if a price was set by an algorithm using personal data.
An Ohio law requiring websites targeting children younger than 18 to obtain parental consent before engaging in contracts with minors is not a violation of the First Amendment, said a bipartisan coalition of 31 states plus the District of Columbia in a joint amicus brief to the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Tuesday. Later that day, South Carolina filed a document joining the coalition in asking the court to reverse a district court's 2024 decision to block the law (see 2402130041).
U.S. District Judge Sparkle Sooknanan for the District of Columbia has rejected an FTC request for a stay of an enjoinment in the agency's probe of alleged media outlet collusion. In an opinion Friday (docket 1:25-cv-01959), Sooknanan said the FTC "fall[s] well short of satisfying the high burden needed for a stay pending appeal." With plaintiff Media Matters likely to succeed on the merits of its First Amendment claim, it's unlikely that an FTC appeal will succeed on the merits, the judge said. The agency hasn't identified an irreparable injury that warrants a stay, she added. Media Matters, a left-leaning media watchdog group, sued the FTC in June to block a civil investigative demand that the agency filed in its investigation into alleged collusion between media outlets and social media platforms (see 2506230039).
Software marketing firm Cierant Corporation failed to safeguard customers' personally identifiable information (PII) and protected health information (PHI), which allowed their exposure in a 2024 breach, alleged a class-action lawsuit filed Thursday. Plaintiff Melissa Gifford brought the suit in the U.S. District Court for Connecticut on behalf of her minor child, whose health information was leaked.
Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) activities at the Social Security Administration (SSA) involved data security lapses that risk the exposure of more than 300 million Americans’ social security information, alleged a protected whistleblower Tuesday. SSA denied that its handling of the data put citizens at risk, however.
Media Matters and the FTC are clashing over the agency's requested stay of a preliminary injunction in a federal probe over advertiser boycotts. The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia earlier this month granted the left-leaning journalism watchdog group a preliminary injunction against the agency's civil investigative demand (CID) in the probe (see 2508180026). The FTC last week asked the court to stay the preliminary injunction pending appeal. It told the court (docket 1:25-cv-01959) it has issued 17 CIDs to advertising trade associations, brand safety rating organizations and advocacy groups like Media Matters as it investigates whether online advertisers or ad agencies coordinated the placement of ads in ways that had certain news outlets or platforms rated not "brand suitable" or "brand safe." The preliminary injunction impedes the FTC investigation by barring it from determining whether Media Matters has any information relevant to the investigation into advertiser boycotts, the agency said.
A federal judge ruled Monday that New Jersey’s Daniel’s Law isn't preempted by the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), refusing to dismiss two voter registration record websites from a consolidated constitutionality case about the statute. However, Judge Harvey Bartle found for the U.S. District Court for New Jersey that the state law is inconsistent with a provision of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and dismissed part of the complaint.
The Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) fails to establish how federal law preempts a state social media law that would prohibit kids 13 and younger from creating social media accounts, Florida argued Thursday in asking a federal court to dismiss some of the organization's amended complaint in case 4:24-cv-00438.